FIELD OF STUDY AS A FACTOR INFLUENCING THE MODEL OF VALUE-ADDED ASSESSMENT

Authors

  • Radek Krpec University of Ostrava
  • Michal Burda University of Ostrava

Keywords:

Value-added, Relative gain of knowledge, on-line educational testing

Abstract

This contribution deals with the possibilities of schools’ results evaluation and unbiased assessment of the so called education value-added. Value-added models in education express school contribution to the progress of a pupil in relation to predetermined educational goals. The article is a comparison of two methods of the value-added assessment: method of relative shift and relative gain of knowledge method. The focus is laid on the school’s field of study as a factor which could, to a considerable extent, affect the measurement results. Both methods are used for relatively wide range of data drawn from results of secondary school pupils value-added assessments and are compared in respect to the schools’ classification according to their field of study. The results show that the field of study is a significant factor influencing the value-added assessment outcomes and have to be taken into account.

References

Burda, M. (2006) ‘Visualization of cosymmetric association rules using Hasse diagrams and concept lattices’, In: Znalosti 2006. pp. 175-182. 

Chráska, M. (2007) Metody pedagogického výzkumu: základy kvantitativního výzkumu. Praha: Grada. 

Liu, O. (2011) ‘Value-added assessment in higher education: a comparison of two methods’, Higher Education, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 445-461. 

Lissitz, W. R. (2005) Value Added Models in Education. Maple Grove: JAM Press. 

Malčík, M., Krpec, R. (2010) Monitoring přidané hodnoty ve vzdělávání v Moravskoslezském kraji. Ostravská univerzita v Ostravě.

Malčík, M. (2007) ‘Electronic support of educational results measuring’, In: Proceedings Information & Communication Technology in Education 2007, Rožnov pod Radhoštěm.

Malach, J., Malčík, M., (2010) Value–added assessment in postsecondary schools. Theoretical approaches and research results in the Czech republic. Kultura i Edukacja, vol 79., no. 5, pp. 123-154.

McCaffrey, D., Lockwood, J., Koretz, D., Louis, T., Hamilton, L. (2004) ‘Models for Value-Added Modeling of Teacher Effects’, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 67-101.

Raudenbush, S.W., Willms, J.D. (1995) ‘The Estimation of School Effects’, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 307-335.

Sanders, W.L., Horn, S.P. (1994) ‘The tennessee value-added assessment system (TVAAS): Mixed-model methodology in educational assessment’, Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, vol 8., no. 3, pp. 299-311.

SCIO (2008) Vektor Modul 3: Manuál. Praha.

Additional Files

Published

2011-06-30

How to Cite

Krpec, R. and Burda, M. (2011) ’FIELD OF STUDY AS A FACTOR INFLUENCING THE MODEL OF VALUE-ADDED ASSESSMENT’, Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 64–76 Retrieved from https://www.eriesjournal.com/index.php/eries/article/view/34.

Issue

Section

Research Paper