Exploring the Practical Impacts of Research Engagement on English Language Teaching
Insights from an Online Community of Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2023.160105Keywords:
Online communities of practice, Practitioner research, Professional development, Teacher practical knowledgeAbstract
Practitioner research has been gaining prominence as a means for professional development (PD) since it provides teachers with opportunities to reflect on, comprehend, and transform their practices. However, there is a dearth of research that examines how teachers learn in online communities established to mentor teachers across the world to learn how to do research for PD. This study explores teacher researchers’ use and integration of their research experiences in their teaching as well as uncovering how they develop professionally. To this end, we contacted and interviewed 5 international teacher researchers who participated in our 5-week online training in 2021 within the scope of TESOL’s Electronic Village Online (EVO) and shared the preliminary findings. Interviews lasted around 50 minutes during which teachers reflected on their research experience in retrospect and self-reported how this influenced and informed teaching. Transcripts are analyzed thematically through the NVivo software. Findings indicate that our participants reported practical improvement in their instructions not only during but also after the research. They also highlighted how research implementation with their students created opportunities to revisit their own beliefs and the corresponding practices. The study has implications for in-service teacher educators and research mentors who provide online research-driven PD.
References
Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. B., Garrison, R. D., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., and Swan, K. P. (2008) ‘Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample’, The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 11, No. 3–4, pp. 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
Burns, A. (2014) ‘Professional learning in Australian ELICOS: An Action Research Orientation’, English Australia Journal, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 3–20.
Cabaroğlu, N. (2014) ‘Professional development through action research: Impact on self-efficacy’, System, Vol. 44, pp. 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.03.003
Clandinin, D. J. (1986) Classroom practice: Teacher images in action, London: Falmer Press.
Clandinin, D. J. (1992) ‘Creating spaces for teachers' voices’, The Journal of Educational Thought, pp. 59–61.
Dille, K. B. and Røkenes, F. M. (2021) ‘Teachers’ professional development in formal online communities: A scoping review’, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 105, 103431, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103431
Dikilitaş, K. and Yaylı, D. (2018) ‘Teachers’ professional identity development through action research’, ELT Journal, Vol. 72, No. 4, pp. 415–424. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy027
Dikilitaş, K. and Çomoğlu, I. (2022a) ‘Mentoring beginning TESOL teacher researchers: experiences from international contexts’, European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 135–150.
Dikilitaş, K. and Çomoğlu, I. (2022b) ‘Pre-service English teachers’ reflective engagement with stories of exploratory action research’, European Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1795123
Edwards, E. and Burns, A. (2016) ‘Language Teacher–Researcher Identity Negotiation: An Ecological Perspective’, TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 735–745. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.313
Elbaz, F. (1983) Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge, London: Croom Helm.
Eshchar-Netz, L. and Vedder-Weiss, D. (2020) ‘Teacher learning in communities of practice: The affordances of co-planning for novice and veteran teachers’ learning’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 366–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21663
Feldman, J. (2020) ‘The role of professional learning communities to support teacher development: A social practice theory perspective’, South African Journal of Education, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v40n1a1668
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., and Archer, W. (1999) ‘Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education’, Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 2, No. 2–3, pp. 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Gilken, J. M. and Johnson, H. L. (2019) ‘Implementing a Peer Feedback Intervention within a Community of Practice Framework’, Community College Journal of Research and Practice, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2019.1655502
Gholami, K. and Husu, J. (2010) ‘How do teachers reason about their practice? Representing the epistemic nature of teachers’ practical knowledge’, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 26, No. 8, pp. 1520–1529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.001
Golombek, P. R. (1998) ‘A Study of Second Language Teachers’ Personal Practical Knowledge’, TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 32, pp. 447–464. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588117
Göktürk-Sağlam, A.L. and Dikilitaş, K. (2020) ‘Evaluating an Online Professional Learning Community as a Context for PD in Classroom-Based Research’, TESL-EJ, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 1–17.
Heigham, J., and Croker, R. (eds.) (2009) Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction, London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230239517
Hodge, D., C. Haynes, P. LePore, K. Pasquesi, and M. Hirsh (2008) From inquiry to discovery: Developing the student as scholar in a networked world, [Online], Available: https://www.readkong.com/page/from-inquiry-to-discovery-developing-the-student-as-6869220 [3 Nov 2022].
Ion, G., and Iucu, R. (2014) ‘Professionals' perceptions about the use of research in educational practice’, European Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 334–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2014.899154
Jones, W. M. and Dexter, S. (2014) ‘How teachers learn: the roles of formal, informal, and independent learning’, Education Technology Research Development, Vol. 62, pp. 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9337-6
Lantz-Andersson, A., Lundin, M. and Selwynab, N. (2018) ‘Twenty years of online teacher communities: A systematic review of formally-organized and informally-developed professional learning groups’, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 75, pp. 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.008
Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MacPhail, A., Patton, K., Parker, M. and Tannehill, D. (2014) ‘Leading by example: Teacher educators' professional learning through communities of practice’, Quest, Vol. 66, No. 1, 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2013.826139
Margalef, L. and Pareja Roblin, N. (2016) ‘Unpacking the roles of the facilitator in higher education professional learning communities’, Educational Research and Evaluation, Vol. 22, No.4, pp. 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2016.1247722
Murugaiah, P., Azman, H., Thang, S.M and Krish, P. (2012) ‘Teacher learning via communities of practice: A Malaysian case study’, International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, Vol. 7, No.2, pp. 162–174. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijpl.2012.7.2.162
Tanış, A. and Dikilitaş, K. (2018) ‘Turkish EFL Instructors' Engagement in Professional Development’, Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 27–47.
Van Schaik, P., Volman, M., Admiraal, W. and Schenke, W. (2019) ‘Approaches to co-construction of knowledge in teacher learning groups’, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 84, pp. 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.04.019
Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., and Kyndt, E. (2017) ‘Teacher communities as a context for PD: A systematic review’, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 61, pp. 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wang, Q., and Zhang, H. (2014) ‘Promoting teacher autonomy through university–school collaborative action research’, Language Teaching Research, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 222–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813505942
Wenger, E. (1998) ‘Communities of practice: Learning as a social system’, Systems Thinker, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 2–3.
Wieser, C. (2016) ‘Teaching and personal educational knowledge conceptual considerations for research on knowledge transformation’, European Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 39, pp. 588–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1253673
Wyatt, M. (2008) Growth in practical knowledge and teachers’ self-efficacy during an in-service BA (TESOL) programme, [dissertation thesis], Leeds: School of Education, University of Leeds.
Wyatt, M. (2011) ‘Teachers researching their own practice’, ELT Journal, Vol. 65, No. 4, pp. 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq074
Wyatt, M., and Borg, S. (2011) ‘Development in the practical knowledge of language teachers: a comparative study of three teachers designing and using communicative tasks on an in-service BA TESOL programme in the Middle East’, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2010.537340
Wyatt, M. and Dikilitaş, K. (2016) ‘English language teachers becoming more efficacious through research engagement at their Turkish university’, Educational Action Research, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 550–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1076731
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Kenan Dikilitas, Asli Lidice Gokturk Saglam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors declare with this manuscript intended for publication to ERIES Journal that:
- all co-authors agree with the publication of the manuscript even after amendments arising from peer review;
- all co-authors agree with the posting of the full text of this work on the web page of ERIES Journal and to the inclusion of references in databases accessible on the internet;
- no results of other researchers were used in the submitted manuscript without their consent, proper citation, or acknowledgement of their cooperation or material provided;
- the results (or any part of them) used in the manuscript have not been sent for publication to any other journal nor have they already been published (or if so, that the relevant works are cited in this manuscript);
- submission of the manuscript for publication was completed in accordance with the publishing regulations pertaining to place of work;
- experiments performed comply with current laws and written consent of the Scientific Ethics Committee / National Animal Care Authority (as is mentioned in the manuscript submitted);
- grant holders confirm that they have been informed of the submitted manuscript and they agree to its publication.
Authors retain copyright and grant ERIES Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the published work with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. Moreover, authors are able to post the published work in an institutional repository with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. In addition, authors are permitted and encouraged to post the published work online (e.g. institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
