Enhancing Pre-service Mathematics Teachers' Proof-Writing Skills
The Effect of a Social Learning Environment Enriched with Dynamic Geometry Software
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2025.180305Keywords:
proof, teaching proof, reasoning, prospective mathematics teachersAbstract
Mathematical proof, often regarded as the heart of mathematics, is essential for interconnected mathematical knowledge. However, proof-writing skills do not develop inherently. Effective learning environments are vital for university students to enhance these skills. This study investigates the impact of the ISMAT model on pre-service teachers' proof-writing skills. The model, based on quasi-experimental paradigms and arguments from Popper (1979) and Lakatos (1961, 1976), utilizes dynamic geometry software to enhance the understanding of proof functions. It is hypothesized that a social learning environment, augmented by dynamic geometry, will yield observable effects. The research employed a quasi-experimental design with experimental and control groups of pre-service mathematics teachers. The experimental group received 14 weeks of Euclidean geometry lessons using the ISMAT model, while the control group followed traditional methods. Data were collected through proof-writing tests administered pre- and post-instruction. The evaluations were conducted using Senk's (1983) framework for assessing proof-writing skills. Results indicated that the ISMAT model significantly enhanced proof-writing skills compared to traditional teaching methods. Such approaches are recommended to foster active student engagement in the proving process.
References
Alibert, D. and Thomas, M. (1991) ‘Research on mathematical proof’, in Tall, D. (ed.) Advanced mathematical thinking. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 215–230.
Almeida, D. (2000) ‘A survey of mathematics undergraduates’ interaction with proof: Some implications for mathematics education’, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 869–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390050203360
Almeida, D. (2003) ‘Engendering proof attitudes: Can the genesis of mathematical knowledge teach us anything?’, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739031000108574
Al-Sa’ad, S. J. and Alzoebi, A. M. A. (2024) ‘The effect of training program based on instructional practices according to the (NCTM) standards on improving the pedagogical knowledge among mathematics teachers in Jordan’, Al-Mağallaẗ al-Tarbawiyyaẗ al-Urdunniyyaẗ, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 240–262. https://doi.org/10.46515/jaes.v9i2.668
Avigad, J. (2005) Mathematical method and proof. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ball, D.L. and Bass, H. (2003) ‘Making mathematics reasonable in school’, in Kilpatrick, J., Martin, W.G. and Schifter, D. (eds.) A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, pp. 27–44.
Ball, D.L., Hoyles, C., Jahnke, H.N. and Movshovitz-Hadar, N. (2002) ‘The teaching of proof’, in Tatsien, L.I. (ed.) Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians. Vol. III. Beijing: Higher Education Press, pp. 907–920.
Bell, A. W. (1976) ‘A study of pupils’ proof-explanations in mathematical situations’, Educational Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 7, No. 1–2, pp. 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00144356
Bermudez, H. and Graysay, D. (2025) ‘Supporting students in exploring, developing, and formalizing mathematical arguments’, PRIMUS, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 102–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2024.2445517
Bobango, J. C. (1987) Van Hiele levels of geometric thought and student achievement in standard content and proof writing: The effect of phase-based instruction. Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Buchbinder, O. and McCrone, S. (2020) ‘Preservice teachers learning to teach proof through classroom implementation: Successes and challenges’, The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, Vol. 58, 100779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100779
Buchbinder, O. and McCrone, S. (2023) ‘Preparing prospective secondary teachers to teach mathematical reasoning and proof: The case of the role of examples in proving’, ZDM – Mathematics Education, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01493-4
Burgett, R. (2018) Rethinking mathematical proofs and the opportunity to learn. Unpublished master’s thesis, State University of New York.
Chazan, D. (1993) ‘High school geometry students’ justification for their views of empirical evidence and mathematical proof’, Educational Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 359–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01273371
Cilli-Turner, E. (2017) ‘Impacts of inquiry pedagogy on undergraduate students conceptions of the function of proof’, The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, Vol. 48, pp. 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.07.001
Conner, K. A. and Krejci, B. (2021) ‘Developing secondary students’ understanding of proof through constructing, critiquing, and revising arguments’, Investigations in Mathematics Learning, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2021.2000201
Cook-Box, J. E. (1996) An investigation of the differential effects of Mira manipulative use on secondary students’ development of geometric proofs involving perpendicular bisectors in polygons. Doctoral dissertation, University of New Orleans. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Csanádi, Á., Kollar, I. and Fischer, F. (2020) ‘Pre-service teachers’ evidence-based reasoning during pedagogical problem-solving: Better together?’, European Journal of Psychology of Education, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 467–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00467-4
De Villiers, M. (1990) ‘The role and function of proof in mathematics’, Pythagoras, Vol. 24, pp. 17–24.
De Villiers, M. (1999) Rethinking proof with The Geometer’s Sketchpad. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
Dickerson, D. S. and Doerr, H. M. (2014) ‘High school mathematics teachers’ perspectives on the purposes of mathematical proof in school mathematics’, Mathematics Education Research Journal, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0091-6
Dolev, S. and Even, R. (2013) ‘Justifications and explanations in Israeli 7th grade math textbooks’, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Vol. 13, No. S2, pp. 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9488-7
Driscoll, M. (1987) Research within reach: Secondary school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Erdem, E. (2015) Zenginleştirilmiş öğrenme ortamının matematiksel muhakeme ve tutuma etkisi. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Atatürk University.
Erdoğan, F. and Kalkan, S. (2024) ‘Delving into the critical thinking skills of pre-service mathematics teachers with their metacognitive awareness’, Participatory Educational Research, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 90–108. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.90.11.6
Ferrari, P.L. (2004) ‘Mathematical language and advanced mathematical learning’, in Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Vol. 2. Bergen, Norway: PME, pp. 383–390.
Flores, A. (2002) ‘How do children know that what they learn in mathematics is true?’, Teaching Children Mathematics, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 269–274. https://doi.org/10.5951/tcm.8.5.0269
Forman, E. A., Larreamendy-Joerns, J., Stein, M. K. and Brown, C. A. (1998) ‘You’re going to want to find out which and prove it: Collective argumentation in a mathematics classroom’, Learning and Instruction, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 527–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4752(98)00033-4
Francisco, J. M. and Maher, C. A. (2005) ‘Conditions for promoting reasoning in problem solving: Insights from a longitudinal study’, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, Vol. 24, No. 3–4, pp. 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.09.001
Generazzo, S. D. (2011) Proof and reasoning in an inquiry-oriented class: The impact of classroom discourse. Doctoral dissertation, University of New Hampshire. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
González, G. and Herbst, P. G. (2006) ‘Competing arguments for the geometry course: Why were American high school students supposed to study geometry in the twentieth century?’, International Journal for the History of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 7-33.
Greenberg, M.J. (1993) Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometries: Development and history. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Grundmeier, T. A., Retsek, D., Berg, A., Mann, S. and Prieto, H. (2022) ‘Assumptions and definition use in an inquiry-based introduction to proof course’, PRIMUS, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2020.1827321
Hanna, G. (1991) ‘Mathematical proof’, in Tall, D. (ed.) Advanced mathematical thinking. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 54–61.
Hanna, G. (2000) ‘Proof, explanation and exploration: An overview’, Educational Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 44, No. 1–3, pp. 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012737223465
Hanna, G. and Barbeau, E. (2010) ‘Proofs as bearers of mathematical knowledge’, in Hanna, G., Jahnke, H.N. and Pulte, H. (eds.) Explanation and proof in mathematics: Philosophical and educational perspectives. New York: Springer, pp. 85–100.
Hanna, G. and Jahnke, H.N. (1996) ‘Proof and proving’, in Bishop, A.J., Clements, K., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J. and Laborde, C. (eds.) International handbook of mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 877–908.
Hanna, G., de Bruyn, Y., Sidoli, N. and Lomas, D. (2004) ‘Teaching proof in the context of physics’, ZDM Mathematics Education, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02652775
Hanna, G., Jahnke, H.N. and Pulte, H. (eds.) (2010) Explanation and proof in mathematics: Philosophical and educational perspectives. New York: Springer.
Hanna, G., Larvor, B. and Yan, X. (2023) ‘Human-machine collaboration in the teaching of proof’, Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 99–117. https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.azev3747
Haralambos, V. (2000) A qualitative comparative study of tenth-grade students’ geometric proofs. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Harel, G. and Fuller, E. (2009) ‘Current contributions toward comprehensive perspectives on the learning and teaching of proof’, in Stylianou, D.A., Blanton, M.L. and Knuth, E.J. (eds.) Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K–16 perspective. New York: Routledge, pp. 355–370.
Harel, G. and Sowder, L. (2007) ‘Toward a comprehensive perspective on proof’, in Lester, F. (ed.) Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, pp. 805–842.
Hart, E. W. (1986) An exploratory study of the proof-writing performance of college students in elementary group theory. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Iowa. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Heintz, B. (2000) Die Innenwelt der Mathematik: Zur Kultur und Praxis einer beweisenden Disziplin. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Heinze, A. and Reiss, K. (2009) ‘Developing argumentation and proof competencies in the mathematics classroom’, in Stylianou, D.A., Blanton, M.L. and Knuth, E.J. (eds.) Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K–16 perspective. New York: Routledge, pp. 191–203.
Heinze, A., Cheng, Y. H., Ufer, S., Lin, F. L. and Reiss, K. (2008) ‘Strategies to foster students’ competencies in constructing multi-steps geometric proofs: Teaching experiments in Taiwan and Germany’, ZDM Mathematics Education, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0092-1
Herbst, P. and Brach, C. (2006) ‘Proving and doing proofs in high school geometry classes: What is it that is going on for students?’, Cognition and Instruction, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 73–122. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2401_2
Hersh, R. (1997) What is mathematics, really? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hersh, R. (2009) ‘What I would like my students to already know about proof’, in Stylianou, D.A., Blanton, M.L. and Knuth, E.J. (eds.) Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K–16 perspective. New York: Routledge, pp. 17–20.
Hiebert, J. and Grouws, D.A. (2007) ‘The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning’, in Lester, F.K. (ed.) Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, pp. 371–404.
Hodson, D. (2008) ‘Exploring alternative views of science: The ideas of Popper, Lakatos and Kuhn’, in Towards scientific literacy. Rotterdam: Brill, pp. 67–83.
Hoyles, C. and Healy, L. (2007) ‘Curriculum change and geometrical reasoning’, in Boero, P. (ed.) Theorems in school: From history, epistemology and cognition to classroom practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 81–115.
Hoyles, C. and Küchemann, D. (2002) ‘Students’ understandings of logical implication’, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51, pp. 193–223.
Hsu, H. (2010) The study of Taiwanese students’ experiences with geometric calculation with number (GCN) and their performance on GCN and geometric proof. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Jones, K. and Herbst, P. (2012) ‘Proof, proving, and teacher–student interaction: Theories and contexts’, in Hanna, G. and de Villiers, M. (eds.) Proof and proving in mathematics education: The 19th ICMI study. New York: Springer, pp. 261–277.
Knuth, E.J., Choppin, J.M. and Bieda, K.N. (2009) ‘Middle school students’ production of mathematical justifications’, in Stylianou, D.A., Blanton, M.L. and Knuth, E.J. (eds.) Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K–16 perspective. New York: Routledge, pp. 153–170.
Knuth, E. and Elliott, R. (1997) ‘Preservice secondary mathematics teachers’ interpretations of mathematical proof’, in Proceedings of the 19th Conference of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME-NA). Bloomington, IL: PME, pp. 545–551.
Ko, Y.-Y. and Knuth, E. (2009) ‘Undergraduate mathematics majors’ writing performance producing proofs and counterexamples about continuous functions’, The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.04.005
Kohen, Z., & Kramarski, B. (2018). ‘Promoting mathematics teachers’ pedagogical metacognition: A theoretical-practical model and case study’ In Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mevarech & D. R. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education: Learning, teaching and assessment, Springer, pp. 279-305. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_13
Lakatos, I. (1961) ‘Essays in the logic of mathematical discovery’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 11, No. 42, pp. 1–25.
Lakatos, I. (1976) Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, K. (2011) Students’ logical reasoning and mathematical proving of implications. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Lee, W. (1999) The relationship between students’ proof-writing ability and Van Hiele levels of geometric thought in a college geometry course. Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Maher, C.A. and Davis, R.B. (1995) ‘Children’s explorations leading to proof’, in Hoyles, C. and Healy, L. (eds.) Justifying and proving in school mathematics. London: Mathematical Sciences Group. Institute of Education, University of London, pp. 87–105.
Mariotti, M.A. (2006) ‘Proof and proving in mathematics education’, in Gutiérrez, A. and Boero, P. (eds.) Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 173–204.
Marrades, R. and Gutiérrez, A. (2000) ‘Proofs produced by secondary school students learning geometry in a dynamic computer environment’, Educational Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 44, No. 1–3, pp. 87–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012785106627
Martin, T. and McCrone, S. (2009) ‘Formal proof in high school geometry: Students’ perceptions of structure, validity and purpose’, in Stylianou, D.A., Blanton, M.L. and Knuth, E.J. (eds.) Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K–16 perspective. New York: Routledge, pp. 191–203.
Mata-Pereira, J. and da Ponte, J. P. (2017) ‘Enhancing students’ mathematical reasoning in the classroom: teacher actions facilitating generalization and justification’, Educational Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 96, No. 2, pp. 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9773-4
Matsuda, N. (2004) The impact of different proof strategies on learning geometry theorem proving. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Melhuish, K., Fukawa-Connelly, T., Dawkins, P. C., Woods, C. and Weber, K. (2022) ‘Collegiate mathematics teaching in proof-based courses: What we know now and what we have yet to learn’, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, Vol. 67, 100986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100986
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB) (2013) Ortaöğretim matematik dersi (9, 10, 11 ve 12. sınıflar) öğretim programı. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
Miyazaki, M., Fujita, T. and Jones, K. (2016) ‘Students’ understanding of the structure of deductive proof’, Educational Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 94, No. 2, pp. 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9720-9
Moore, R. C. (1994) ‘Making the transition to formal proof’, Educational Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01273731
Moore, R. C. (2016) ‘Mathematics professors’ evaluation of students’ proofs: a complex teaching practice’, International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 246–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0029-y
Moreno, G.A. (2003) Relationships between interaction, definitions and proof. Master’s thesis, University of Texas. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Nasibov, F. and Kaçar, A. (2005) ‘On the mathematics and mathematics education’, Kastamonu Education Journal, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 339–346.
Ndemo, Z., Mtetwa, D. J. and Zindi, F. (2019) ‘What should be the object of research with respect to the notion of mathematical proof?’, Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 7–16. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v13i1.9558
Ozturk, T. (2016) Matematik öğretmeni adaylarının ispatlama becerilerini geliştirmeye yönelik tasarlanan öğrenme ortamının değerlendirilmesi [The evaluation of the learning environment designed for improving prospective mathematics teachers’ proving skills]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Karadeniz Technical University.
Pedemonte, B. and Reid, D. (2011) ‘The role of abduction in proving processes’, Educational Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 76, No. 3, pp. 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9275-0
Popper, K. (1979) Objective knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pulley, C. A. (2010) Using instruction to investigate the effects of assessing reasoning tasks on students’ understanding of proof. Doctoral dissertation, Illinois State University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Reiss, K., Hellmich, F. and Reiss, M. (2002) ‘Reasoning and proof in geometry: Prerequisites of knowledge acquisition in secondary school students’, in Cockburn, A. and Nardi, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 26th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Vol. 4. Norwich, UK: PME, pp. 113–120.
Remillard, K. S. (2009) The mathematical discourse of undergraduate mathematics majors: The relation to learning proof and establishing a learning community. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Ross, K. (1998) ‘Doing and proving: The place of algorithms and proof in school mathematics’, American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 105, No. 3, pp. 252–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1998.12004875
Schoenfeld, A.H. (1985) Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Selden, A. and Selden, J. (2007) Overcoming students’ difficulties in learning to understand and construct proofs. Technical Report No. 2007-1. Available at: http://www.math.tntech.edu/techreports/TR_2007_1.pdf
Selden, J., Selden, A. and McKee, K. (2008) ‘Improving advanced students’ proving abilities’, paper presented at the 11th International Congress of Mathematical Education (ICME-11). Monterrey, Mexico, 6–13 July.
Senk, S. L. (1983) Proof-writing achievement and Van Hiele levels among secondary school geometry students. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Chicago. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Smith, J. C. (2006) ‘A sense-making approach to proof: Strategies of students in traditional and problem-based number theory courses’, The Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.11.005
Sommerhoff, D., Kollar, I. and Ufer, S. (2021) ‘Supporting mathematical argumentation and proof skills: Comparing the effectiveness of a sequential and a concurrent instructional approach to support resource-based cognitive skills’, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 11, 572165. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572165
Stylianides, A. (2007) ‘Proof and proving in school mathematics’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 289–321. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/30034869
Stylianides, A. J. and Ball, D. L. (2008) ‘Understanding and describing mathematical knowledge for teaching: Knowledge about proof for engaging students in the activity of proving’, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 307–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9077-9
Stylianides, A. J. and Stylianides, G. J. (2009) ‘Proof constructions and evaluations’, Educational Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 72, No. 2, pp. 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9191-3
Stylianides, G. J. (2008) ‘An analytic framework of reasoning-and-proving’, For the Learning of Mathematics, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 9–16. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40248592
Stylianides, G. J. (2009) ‘Reasoning-and-proving in school mathematics textbooks’, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 258–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903253954
Stylianides, G. J. and Stylianides, A. J. (2017) ‘Research based interventions in the area of proof: The past, the present, and the future’, Educational Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 96, No. 2, pp. 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9782-3
Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J. and Shilling-Traina, L. N. (2013) ‘Prospective teachers’ challenges in teaching reasoning and proving’, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 1463–1490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9409-9
Stylianou, D. A., Blanton, M. L. and Knuth, E. J. (eds.) (2009) Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K–16 perspective. New York: Routledge.
Subramanian, L. (1991) An investigation of high school geometry students’ proving and logical thinking abilities and the impact of dynamic geometry software on student performance. Doctoral dissertation, University of Mumbai. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Tinto, P.P. (1990) Students’ views on learning proof in high school geometry: An analytic-inductive approach. Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Toluk, Z. (2003) ‘Üçüncü uluslararası matematik ve fen araştırması (TIMMS): Matematik nedir?’, İlköğretim Online Dergisi, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 36-41.
Tubridy, A.F. (1992) An instructional strategy to enhance proof-writing ability in secondary school geometry. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weber, K. (2001) ‘Student difficulty in constructing proofs: The need for strategic knowledge’, Educational Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015535614355
Weber, K. (2006) ‘Investigating and teaching the processes used to construct proofs’, in Hitt, F., Harel, G. and Selden, A. (eds.) Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education VI. Providence. RI: American Mathematical Society, pp. 197–232.
Weber, K., Maher, C., Powell, A. and Lee, H. S. (2008) ‘Learning opportunities from group discussions: Warrants become the objects of debate’, Educational Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9114-8
Winer, M. L. and Battista, M. T. (2022) ‘Investigating students’ proof reasoning: analyzing students’ oral proof explanations and their written proofs in high school geometry’, International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, Vol. 17, No. 2, em0677. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11713
Worrall, J. (2003) ‘Normal science and dogmatism, paradigms and progress: Kuhn “versus” Popper and Lakatos’, in Nickles, T. (ed.) Thomas Kuhn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–100.
Yackel, E. and Hanna, G. (2003) ‘Reasoning and proof’, in Kilpatrick, J., Martin, W.G. and Schifter, D. (eds.) A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, pp. 227–236.
Yankelewitz, D., Mueller, M. and Maher, C. A. (2010) ‘A task that elicits reasoning: A dual analysis’, The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2010.02.002
Yoo, S. and Smith, C. (2007) ‘Differences between mathematics majors’ view of mathematical proof after lecture-based and problem-based instruction’, in Lamberg, T. and Wiest, L.R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Reno, NV: University of Nevada, pp. 84–86.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tuğba ÖZTÜRK, Bülent GÜVEN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors declare with this manuscript intended for publication to ERIES Journal that:
- all co-authors agree with the publication of the manuscript even after amendments arising from peer review;
- all co-authors agree with the posting of the full text of this work on the web page of ERIES Journal and to the inclusion of references in databases accessible on the internet;
- no results of other researchers were used in the submitted manuscript without their consent, proper citation, or acknowledgement of their cooperation or material provided;
- the results (or any part of them) used in the manuscript have not been sent for publication to any other journal nor have they already been published (or if so, that the relevant works are cited in this manuscript);
- submission of the manuscript for publication was completed in accordance with the publishing regulations pertaining to place of work;
- experiments performed comply with current laws and written consent of the Scientific Ethics Committee / National Animal Care Authority (as is mentioned in the manuscript submitted);
- grant holders confirm that they have been informed of the submitted manuscript and they agree to its publication.
Authors retain copyright and grant ERIES Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the published work with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. Moreover, authors are able to post the published work in an institutional repository with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. In addition, authors are permitted and encouraged to post the published work online (e.g. institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
