QUALITY CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENTS MECHANISM OF STUDY FIELD - FOCUSED ON PROFESSIONAL STUDY FIELD

  • Zdeněk Vondra Graphic and Multimedia Laboratory, Faculty of informatics and statistics, University of Economics, Prague, nám. W. Churchilla 4, Praha, 130 67, Czech Republic
Keywords: continuous development, control mechanism, education, multimedia in economic practice, professional study field, quality

Abstract

Quality control mechanism that allows long term improvements of a study field or a study program is necessary for good functioning of educational institution or department in actual nature of competitive universities’ environment. This paper focuses on quality control mechanisms in general and more closely on professional study fields. The professional study fields have been settled in Czech higher education by approving the amendment to the Higher Education Act. This brings new need for control and improvement mechanisms based more on connection to industry practice than on academic publications. The aim of this paper is to explain the importance of gathering information from contact with study field’s stakeholders. These information lead to form appropriate improvements implemented on time. In the case study, there are presented examples of gathered findings and how they are being handled. They include the student‘s expectations that underrate theory although it is needed for basic insight to the industry. The students are also motivated to start their own business. What this paper brings is the proposed continuous development mechanism that helped to improve the bachelors study field Multimedia in Economic Practice and also the general recommendations that should help to any other study field.

References


  • Brennan, J. (2008) Higher education looking forward: An agenda for future research, Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.

  • Checkland, P. B., Scholes, J. (2001) ‘Soft Systems Methodology in Action‘, in Rosenhead, J. and Mingers, J. (ed.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited, Chichester: Wiley.

  • Frei, E., Stamm, M. and Budderberg-Fischer, B. (2010) ‘Mentoring programs for medical students - a review of the PubMed literature 2000 – 2008‘, BMC Medical Education, Vol. 10, No. 32. http://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-32

  • Mayer, R. E. (2009) Multimedia learning, 2nd edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Myers, M. D. (2013) Qualitative research in business and management, Sage.

  • Oliveira, M. d., Melo-Silva, L. L., Taveira, M. C. and Grace, R. C. (2016) ‘Measuring university-to-work success: development of a new scale‘, Career Development International, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 85-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/CDI-04-2015-0051

  • Paskin, D. (2013) ‘Attitudes and perceptions of public relations professionals towards graduating students’ skills‘, Public Relations Review, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 251–253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.01.003

  • Pugach, V., Syrtsova, E. and Tokmakova, O. (2015) ‘Online model of education quality assurance equasp implementation: Experience of Vyatka state university‘, International Journal for Quality Research, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 513-526.

  • Sam, C. and van der Sijde, P. (2014) ‘Understanding the concept of the entrepreneurial university from the perspective of higher education models‘, Higher education, Vol. 68, No. 6, pp. 891–908.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9750-0

  • Stark, J. S. (1998) ‘Classifying Professional Preparation Programs‘, The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 69, No. 4, pp. 353–383.  http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2649270

  • Subbaye, R. and Vithal, R. (2017) ‘Teaching criteria that matter in university academic promotions‘, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 37-60.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1082533

  • Vaughan, T. (2008) Multimedia: making it work, 7th edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Vondra, Z. and Vltavská, K. (2014) ‘Revision of Course Settings in Multimedia in Economic Practice Study Field‘, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education (ERIE 2014), Prague, pp. 898-904.

  • Vondra, Z. (2016) ‘Continuous development of professional study field‘, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education (ERIE 2016), Prague, pp. 666–674.

  • Yin, R. K. (2009) Case study research: Design and methods, Sage publications.

  • MŠMT (2016) IPN KREDO, [Online], Available: http://kredo.reformy-msmt.cz [28 Oct 2016].

  • Zákon č. 111/1998 Sb., o vysokých školách a o změně a doplnění dalších zákonů (zákon o vysokých školách), ve znění pozdějších předpisů, a některé další zákony [the amendment to the Higher Education Act 2016]. In: Sbírka zákonů 137/2016, částka 53. ISSN 1211-1244.

Published
2017-04-10
How to Cite
Vondra, Z. (2017) ’QUALITY CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENTS MECHANISM OF STUDY FIELD - FOCUSED ON PROFESSIONAL STUDY FIELD’, Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 16-23. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2017.100103
Section
Research Paper