Understanding LMS Acceptance in Vocational Secondary Education

Extending the Technology Acceptance Model Using SEM-GSCA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2026.190305

Keywords:

Learning Management System, SEM-GSCA, Technology Acceptance Model, Vocational School

Abstract


This study examines vocational secondary school students’ acceptance of Learning Management Systems (LMS) by extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with external factors, including computer self-efficacy (CSE), subjective norm (SN), perceived enjoyment (PE), perceived accessibility (PA), and perceived playfulness (PP). A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted with 252 students at one vocational secondary school in Surabaya, Indonesia, and the data were analyzed using SEM-GSCA. The findings showed that PA was the only external factor significantly associated with PEOU, whereas the other external variables showed no significant associations with PU or PEOU. Within the TAM framework, PEOU was significantly associated with PU and ATU, whereas PU emerged as the strongest predictor of both ATU and BI. BI also significantly predicted actual LMS use. In this sample, LMS acceptance was more strongly associated with accessibility and functional utility than with motivational or hedonic factors. The study extends the application of TAM to vocational secondary education and suggests that schools and LMS developers should prioritize accessibility, usability, and pedagogical relevance to support sustainable LMS adoption.

Author Biographies

Lifa Farida Panduwinata, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

Prisilia Joyceline Atmojo, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Febrika Yogie Hermanto, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                       

References

Abdullah, F. and Ward, R. (2016) ‘Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors’, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 56, pp. 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036

Ahmad, N. A., Elias, N. F., Sahari, N. and Mohamed, H. (2023) ‘Learning management system acceptance factors for technical and vocational education training (TVET) institutions’, TEM Journal, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 1156–1165. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM122-61

Ajzen, I. (1991) ‘The Theory of Planned Behavior’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Al-Adwan, A. S., Albelbisi, N. A., Hujran, O., Al-Rahmi, W. M. and Alkhalifah, A. (2021) ‘Developing a Holistic Success Model for Sustainable E-Learning: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach Ahmad’, Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 13, No. 16, p. 9453. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169453

Al-Adwan, A. S., Li, N., Al-Adwan, A., Abbasi, G. A., Albelbisi, N. A. and Habibi, A. (2023) ‘Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Predict University Students’ Intentions to Use Metaverse-Based Learning Platforms’, Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 28, No. 11, pp. 15381–15413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11816-3

Al-Aulamie, A., Mansour, A., Daly, H. and Adjei, O. (2012) ‘The effect of interinsic motivation on learners’ behavioural intention to use e-learning systems’, Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET.2012.6246057

Al-Aulamie, A. (2013) Enhanced technology acceptance model to explain and predict learners’ behavioural intentions in learning management systems, PhD thesis, Luton: University of Bedfordshire.

Al-Debei, M. M. (2014) ‘The Quality and Acceptance of Websites: an Empirical Investigation in the Context of Higher Education’, International Journal of Business Information Systems, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2014.059252

Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R. and Sinclair, J.. (2020) ‘Evaluating E-learning Systems Success: An Empirical Study’, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 102, pp. 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004

Al-Gahtani, S. S. (2016) ‘Empirical Investigation of E-learning Acceptance and Assimilation: a Structural Equation Model’, Applied Computing and Informatics, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2014.09.001

Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alzahrani, A. I., Yahaya, N., Alalwan, N. and Kamin, Y. B. (2020) ‘Digital Communication: Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Usage for Education Sustainability’, Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 12, No. 12, p. 5052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125052

Almaiah, M. A., Al-khasawneh, A. and Althunibat, A. (2020) ‘Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic’, Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 5261–5280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y

Almaiah, M. A., Jalil, M. A. and Man, M. (2016) ‘Extending the TAM to Examine the Effects of Quality Features on Mobile Learning Acceptance’, Journal of Computers in Education, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 453–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-016-0074-1

Alshammari, S. H. (2020) ‘The Influence of Technical Support, Perceived Self-efficacy, and Instructional Design on Students’ Use of Learning Management Systems’, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 112–141. https://doi.org/10.17718/TOJDE.762034

Arief, U.M. et al. (2021) ‘Computer Self-Efficacy and Organizational Culture In Affecting Technology Acceptance Model’, Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 484–489. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i5.997

Barz, N., Benick, M., Dörrenbächer-Ulrich, L. and Perels, F. (2024) ‘Students’ acceptance of e-learning: extending the technology acceptance model with self-regulated learning and affinity for technology’, Discover Education, Vol. 3, No. 114, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00195-7

Benson, O. O. et al. (2020) ‘Students’ Perception of Teachers’ Pedagogical Skills and its Influence on their Attitude towards Science, Implication for Science, Technology and Engineering Careers’, International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 14701–14714. https://doi.org/10.24247/ijmperdjun20201397

Cahyanti, A. D., Hermanto, F. Y., Rosy, B., Atmojo, P. J., Utami, A. T. and Maulida, M. S. (2025) ‘Technology acceptance model on pedagogical skills: The moderating role of Android game addiction’, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, Vol. 103, No. 12, pp. 5203–5212.

Ching-Ter, C., Hajiyev, J. and Su, C.R. (2017) ‘Examining the Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use E-learning in Azerbaijan? The General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-learning Approach’, Computers and Education, Vol. 111, pp. 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.010

Creswell, J. W. and Creswell, J. D. (2018) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 5th edition, Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

Davis, F. D. (1989) ‘Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology’, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Davis, F. D. (1993) ‘User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts’, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022

Downey, J. P. and Kher, H. V. (2015) ‘A Longitudinal Examination of the Effects of Computer Self-efficacy Growth on Performance during Technology Training’, Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, Vol. 14, pp. 91–111. https://doi.org/10.28945/2114

Espinosa, E. O. C., Ruiz, J. A. C. and Mercado, M. T. C. (2021) ‘Computational Self-Efficacy and Information Skills in Postgraduate Students in Administration at the Times of Covid-19’, Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 118–129. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2021.140205

Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981) ‘Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics’, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 382–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980

Goodhue, D. L. and Thompson, R. L. (1995) ‘Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance’, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 213–236. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689

Gurban, M. A. and Almogren, A. S. (2022) ‘Students’ Actual Use of E-Learning in Higher Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic’, Sage Open, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221091250

Hai, L., Sang, G., Wang, H., Li, W. and Bao, X. (2022) ‘An Empirical Investigation of University Students’ Behavioural Intention to Adopt Online Learning: Evidence from China’, Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 10, p. 403. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12100403

Hair, J. and Alamer, A. (2022) ‘Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example’, Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, Vol. 1, No. 3, Article 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027

Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. and Sarstedt, M. (2017) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd edition, Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M. and Sarstedt, M. (2011) ‘PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet’, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202

Halomoan, H., Hakiki, M., Putra, B. A. W., Hamid, M. A., Utami, R., Saputro, I. N., Azizah, W. A., Sabir, A., Hidayah, Y. and Yassin, A. (2026) ‘Deep Learning Methods Towards a Pedagogical Framework and Implementation Strategy: A Study of Information Technology Education Curriculum Development in Indonesia’, Journal of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 185–205. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v20i1.9970

Hamari, J., Koivisto, J. and Sarsa, H. (2014) ‘Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification’, Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2014), Waikoloa, HI, pp. 3025–3034. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377

Hanif, A., Jamal, F. Q. and Imran, M. (2018) ‘Extending the Technology Acceptance Model for Use of e-Learning Systems by Digital Learners’, IEEE Access, Vol. 6, pp. 73395–73404. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2881384

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. and Sarstedt, M. (2015) ‘A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Hermanto, F. Y., Sutirman, Sholikah, M. and Ranu, M. E. (2021) ‘The effectiveness of distance practice learning for facing COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia’, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, Vol. 99, No. 12, pp. 2925–2936.

Hung, S. Y., Tsai, J. C. A. and Chou, S. T. (2016) ‘Decomposing Perceived Playfulness: a Contextual Examination of Two Social Networking Sites’, Information and Management, Vol. 53, No. 6, pp. 698–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.02.005

Hwang, H., Cho, G. and Choo, H. (2024) ‘GSCA Pro—Free Stand-Alone Software for Structural Equation Modeling’, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 696–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2023.2272294

Hwang, H., Ho, M.-H.R. and Lee, J. (2010) ‘Generalized Structured Component Analysis with Latent Interactions’, Psychometrika, Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-010-9157-5

Hwang, H. and Takane, Y. (2004) ‘Generalized Structured Component Analysis’, Psychometrika, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295841

Im, T. (2021) ‘Online and blended learning in vocational training institutions in South Korea’, Knowledge Management & E-Learning, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 194–208. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.011

Jiang, M. Y., Jong, M. S., Lau, W. W., Meng, Y., Chai, C. and Chen, M. (2021) ‘Validating the General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning: Evidence From an Online English as a Foreign Language Course Amid COVID-19’, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 12, p. 671615. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.671615

Castiblanco Jimenez, I. A., Cepeda García, L. C., Violante, M. G., Marcolin, F. and Vezzetti, E. (2021) ‘Commonly Used External TAM Variables in E-learning, Agriculture and Virtual Reality Applications’, Future Internet, Vol. 13, No. 7, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13010007

Kazu, İ. Y. and Yalçin, C. K. (2022) ‘The Relationship Between Secondary School Teachers and Students’ Readiness of Using Flipped Classroom’, Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2022.150101

Khan, S. A., Zainuddin, M., Mahi, M. and Arif, I. (2021) ‘Behavioral intention to use online learning during COVID-19: An analysis of the technology acceptance model’, in I International Conference on Innovative Methods of Teaching and Technological Advancements in Higher Education (IMTTA 2020): Book of Abstracts, Tbilisi: Publishing House Universal, pp. 39–41. Available at: https://eu.edu.ge/sites/default/files/conference/Book%20of%20abstracts%20IMTTA%202020.pdf

Khoirunisa, K. R., Warsono, S. and Mirza. BR, A. D. (2023) ‘Expanding Technology Acceptance Model 3 Use Innovation Diffusion Theory on Accounting Learning During Pandemic: Insight from Indonesia’, The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 26, No. 01, pp. 25–48. https://doi.org/10.33312/ijar.656

Larionova, V., Brown, K., Bystrova, T. and Sinitsyn, E. (2018) ‘Russian Perspectives of Online Learning Technologies in Higher Education: An Empirical Study of a MOOC’, Research in Comparative and International Education, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 70–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499918763420

Lee, B. C., Yoon, J. O. and Lee, I. (2009) ‘Learners’ Acceptance of E-learning in South Korea: Theories and Results’, Computers and Education, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 1320–1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.014

Llamas, M.C.A.R., Vilela-Malabanan, C.M. and Dinawanao, D.D. (2025) ‘Needs and Challenges of Academics and Students in Using a Learning Management System: a User Experience Approach’, Journal of Education and Learning, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 1662–1669. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i3.22350

Mohammadi, H. (2015) ‘Computers in Human Behavior Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model’, Computers and Education, Vol. 45, pp. 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.044

Muhaimin, M., Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., Pratama, R., Asrial, A. and Harja, H. (2019) ‘Predicting Factors Affecting Intention to Use Web 2.0 in Learning: Evidence from Science Education’, Journal of Baltic Science Education, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 595–606. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.595

Ni, A. and Cheung, A. (2023) ‘Understanding Secondary Students’ Continuance Intention to adopt AI-powered Intelligent Tutoring System for English Learning’, Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 3191–3216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11305-z

Octavia, A. C. B. and Nugraha, J. (2024) ‘Influence of Enjoyment and Trust on the Use of Artificial Intelligence-based Voice Assistant in Vocational Students Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)’, Journal of Office Administration: Education and Practice, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 10–23. https://doi.org/10.26740/joaep.v4n1.p10-23

OECD (2021) 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world, PISA, Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en

Or, C. (2024) ‘Watch That Attitude! Examining the Role of Attitude in the Technology Acceptance Model through Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modelling’, Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 558–582. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.575

Park, S. Y. (2009) ‘An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use e-Learning’, Educational Technology and Society, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 150–162.

Park, S. Y., Nam, M. W. and Cha, S. B. (2012) ‘University Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Learning: Evaluating the Technology Acceptance Model’, British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 592–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01229.x

Revythi, A. and Tselios, N. (2019) ‘Extension of Technology Acceptance Model by Using System Usability Scale to Assess Behavioral Intention to Use E-learning’, Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 2341–2355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09869-4

Rogers, J.K.B., Mercado, T.C.R. and Decano, R.S. (2025) ‘Moodle Interactions and Academic Performance: Educational Data Mining in a Philippine University’, Journal of Education and Learning, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 542–550. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21549

Rohana, W.D., Nugraha, J. and Koblianska, I. (2025) ‘Application of TAM to Explore Awareness and Enjoyment of the Use of Artificial Intelligence ChatGPT in Students’, Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran (JPAP), Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 498–512. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpap.v13n2.p498-512

Rokhim, R., Mayasari, I., Wulandari, P. and Haryanto, H. C. (2024) ‘Analysis of the Extrinsic and Intrinsic Aspects of the Technology Acceptance Model Associated with the Learning Management System during the COVID-19 Pandemic’, VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, Vol. 54, No. 6, pp. 1289–1314. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-04-2022-0113

Salloum, S. A., Qasim Mohammad Alhamad, A., Al-Emran, M., Abdel Monem, A. and Shaalan, K. (2019) ‘Exploring Students’ Acceptance of E-Learning Through the Development of a Comprehensive Technology Acceptance Model’, IEEE Access, Vol. 7, pp. 128445–128462. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939467

Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Hernández-García, Á., García-Peñalvo, F. J., Chaparro-Peláez, J. and Olmos-Migueláñez, S. (2019) ‘Break the Walls! Second-Order Barriers and the Acceptance of mLearning by First-Year Pre-Service Teachers’, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 95, pp. 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.019

Snoussi, T. (2019) ‘Learning Management System in Education: Opportunities and Challenges’, International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 12S, pp. 664–667. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.l1161.10812s19

Solichin, A. and Wijaya, R. (2021) ‘Acceptance of E-Learning System at Private University in Indonesia During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Students’ Perspectives’, Jurnal Infotel, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 104–113. https://doi.org/10.20895/infotel.v13i3.662

Solimun, S. and Fernandes, A. A. R. (2017) ‘Investigation the Mediating Variable: What Necessary? (Case Study in Management Research)’, International Journal of Law and Management, Vol. 59, No. 6, pp. 1059–1067. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-09-2016-0077

Söllner, M., Bitzer, P., Janson, A. and Leimeister, J. M. (2018) ‘Process is king: Evaluating the performance of technology-mediated learning in vocational software training’, Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-017-0046-6

Sorensen, K. N. (2019) Millennials’ acceptance of voice activated shopping, Master’s thesis, University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/textilesdiss/13 [Accessed 16 September 2026].

Surjono, H. D., Muhtadi, A. and Trilisiana, N. (2019) ‘The effects of online activities on student learning outcomes in blended learning environment’, Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology (ICEMT 2019), pp. 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/3345120.3345167

Sutirman, Hermanto, F. Y., Adinata, R. E., Atmojo, P. J., Yuliansah ans Suyanto, U. Y. (2026) ‘Technology Acceptance and Self-regulated Learning among Vocational Students: The Mediating Role of Interest in Learning’, Cogent Education, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2026.2687173

Teo, T., Sang, G., Mei, B. and Hoi, C. K. W. (2018) ‘Investigating Pre-service Teachers’ Acceptance of Web 2.0 Technologies in Their Future Teaching: a Chinese Perspective’, Interactive Learning Environments, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1489290

Unlu, H. and Suel, E. (2014) ‘Computer Self-Efficacy of Prospective Physical Education Teachers’, Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 33–36. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2014.070202

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. and Davis, F. D. (2003) ‘User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View’, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000) ‘A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies’, Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Wang, Y. and Lin, K. (2021) ‘Understanding Continuance Usage of Mobile Learning Applications: The Moderating Role of Habit’, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 12, p. 736051. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736051

Additional Files

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Panduwinata, L. F., Atmojo, P. J. and Hermanto, F. Y. (2026) ’Understanding LMS Acceptance in Vocational Secondary Education: Extending the Technology Acceptance Model Using SEM-GSCA’, Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 237–253. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2026.190305

Issue

Section

Research Paper