School Staff-centered School Development by Communicative Action: Working Methods for Creating Collective Responsibility - From the Idea to Action
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2020.130403Keywords:
collective responsibility, democratic method, dialogue café, reflection cycle, school development, working methodsAbstract
School development is often seen as a concerted (re-)action to educational policies, curriculum development, and change in education laws or regulations, and sometimes, as stakeholders’ reactions to low school performance. Generally, school development incorporates organizational, managerial, and educational activities and measures. This is done to adapt to the new situation to achieve the desired changes and goals initiated by a given curriculum reform. In contrast, this paper focuses on school staff–driven development: It describes how teachers together with paraprofessionals contribute to school-development. Using collective responsibility creating working methods of communication, the enactment of staff’s self-chosen measures will be possible. This school staff–driven school development approach makes use of the Dialogue Café and the reflection cycle. The combined use of these working methods is seen as appropriate support for school staff–centered development of the School-In project based on the idea of collective responsibility. The paper presents by the application of a qualitative content and visualization analysis, how the communicative action according to Habermas took place. This is the process from the individual participant’s ideas, through individual and group reflections to finally formulated measures that result in the school’s staff joint actions.
References
Aakvaag, G. C. (2011) Moderne sosiologisk teori, Oslo: Abstrakt forlag AS.
Barr, H. (2013) ‘Toward a theoretical framework for interprofessional education’, Journal of Interprofessional Care, Vol. 27, No 1., pp. 4-9. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2012.698328
Betsch, T., Funke, J. and Plessner, H. (2011) Allgemeine Psychologie für Bachelor: Denken - Urteilen, Entscheiden, Problemlösen. Lesen, Hören, Lernen im Web, Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12474-7
Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S. and Wallace, M. (2005) Creating and sustaining professional learning communities, [Online], Research Report Number 637, London, England: General Teaching Council for England, Department for Education and Skills, [Online], Available: https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/5622/1/RR637.pdf [1 Oct 2020]
Borko, H. (2004) Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain, Educational Researcher, Vol. 33, No. 8, pp. 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
Brown, J. and Issacs, D. (1995) The world café shaping our futures through conversations that matter, San Francisco: McGraw‐Hill Professional.
Bryk, A. and Schneider, B. (2002) Trust in schools: a core resource for improvement, New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Creswell, J. W. and Poth, C. N. (2017) Qualitative inquiry and research design. choosing among five approaches, 4th ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Cuban, L. (1990) ’Reforming Again, Again, and Again’, Educational Researcher, Vol. 19, No.1, pp. 3-13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X019001003
Cuban, L. (2020) ‘Reforming the Grammar of Schooling Again and Again’, American Journal of Education, Vol. 126, No. 4, pp. 665-671. https://doi.org/10.1086/709959
Dahlgren, L. O. (2009) ‘Interprofessional and problem-based learning: A marriage made in heaven?’, Journal of Interprofessional Care, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 448–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820903163579
Dalehefte, I. M. and Hillen, S. (in preparation) ‘The Reflection Cycle as a Working Method’, in Dalehefte, I. M. and Midtsundstad, J. H. (ed.) School-In – A Systemic Approach to School Development – Technical Report, Münster: Waxmann.
Dalehefte, I. M. and Midtsundstad, J. H. (2019) ‘Linking School’s Local Context to Instruction: An Important Characteristic of the In-Service Teacher Professionalisation in School-In’, in Janík, T., Dalehefte, I. M. and Zehetmeier, S. (ed.) Supporting teachers: improving instruction. examples of research-based teacher education, Münster: Waxmann, pp. 77-88.
Dalehefte, I. M., Kristiansen, A. and Midtsundstad, J. H. (2018) The decision for a school intervention – What happens when a democratic school culture and participation of the teaching staff have an influence on the intervention subject? Presented at the INZENTIM & EARLI SIG13 Conference, Essen, Germany, 27 Aug 2018.
Dalehefte, I. M. and Kobarg, M. (2014) Aus Unterrichtsbeobachtungen Lernen. Handreichungen des Sinusprogramm für Grundschulen, Kiel: IPN, [Online], Available: http://www.sinus-an-grundschulen.de/fileadmin/uploads/Material_aus_SGS/Handreichung_DalehefteKobarg_fuer_Web.pdf [1 Oct 2020]
DeVries, H., Bekkers, V. and Tummers, L. (2016) ‘Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda’, Public Administration, Vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
DuFour, R., and Mattos, M. (2013) ‘How do principals really improve schools?’, Educational Leadership, Vol. 70, No. 7, pp. 34-40.
Desimone, L. M. (2009) ‘Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: toward better conceptualisations and measures’, Educational Researcher, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0013189X08331140
Fullan, M. (2010a) All systems go: the change imperative for whole system reform, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452219554
Fullan, M. (2010b) Motion leadership: the skinny on becoming change savvy, Toronto: Ontario Principals Council.
Fullan, M. (2011) Choosing the wrong drivers for whole system reform, Centre for Strategic Education Seminar series paper no. 24, [Online], Available: https://michaelfullan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/13396088160.pdf [1 Oct 2020]
Fullan, M. (2020) ‘System Change in Education’, American Journal of Education, Vol. 126, No. 4, pp. 653-663. https://doi.org/10.1086/709975
Geijsel, F. and Meijers, F. (2005) ‘Identity Learning: The Core Process of Educational Change’, Educational Studies, Vol. 31, No 4, pp. 419-430. . https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690500237488
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research, New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Habermas, J. (1984) The theory of communicative action. Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society, Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1996) Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy, translated by William Rehg, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1999a) Kommunikativ handling, moral og rett, Norge: Tano Aschehoug, AIT Otta AS.
Habermas, J. (1999b) Kraften i de bedre argumenter, Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal.
Hargreaves, A. (2019) ‘Teacher collaboration: 30 years of research on its nature, forms, limitations and effects’, Teachers and Teaching, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 603-621, https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1639499
Hargreaves A. and O’Connor M. T. (2017) ‘Cultures of professional collaboration: their origins and opponents’, Journal of professional capital and community, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 74-85. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-02-2017-0004
Hargreaves, D. H. (1995a) ‘School Culture, School Effectiveness and School Improvement’, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 23‐46. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345950060102
Hargreaves, D. H. (1995b) ‘Beyond Collaboration: Critical Teacher Development in the Postmodern Age’, in Smyth, J. (ed.) Critical teacher development, London: Cassell, pp. 149-180.
Hargreaves, D. H. (2014) ‘A self‐improving school system and its potential for reducing inequality’, Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 696‐714. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.979014
Harris, A. (2011) ‘System Improvement Through Collective Capacity Building’, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 49, No. 6, pp. 624-636. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111174785
Hillen, S. (2019) ‘The Impact of Local Communities on the School Development - A Case Study Examining Expectations and Inclusion on a Systemic Level’, International Journal of Learning Technology and Research, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 23-38. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.2.2
Hillen, S. (in preparation) ‘The Mental Mapping Response Method – A Collective Decision for Intervention in School-In’, in Dalehefte, I. M. and Midtsundstad, J. H. (ed.) School-In – A Systemic Approach to School Development – Technical Report, Münster: Waxmann.
Ingebrigtsvold Sæbø, G. and Midtsundstad, J. H. (2018) ‘Teachers’ Responsibility and Expectations: Dependent on the School Organisation?’, Improving Schools, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 285-295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480218783796
Ingebrigtsvold Sæbø, G. (in preparation) ‘The Dialogue Café as a Working Method’, in Dalehefte, I. M. and Midtsundstad, J. H. (eds.) School-In– A Systemic Approach to School Development – Technical Report, Münster: Waxmann.
Ingebrigtsvold Sæbø, G. and Midtsundstad, J. H. (in review) ‘How to Promote Critical Reflection in Professional Learning Communities. Findings from School-In - An Innovation Research Project in Four Schools’, Professional development in education.
Johnson, K. F., Belcher, T'. W., Zimmerman, B., and Franklin, J. (2020) ‘Interprofessional partnerships involving school counsellors for children with special needs: a broad based systematic review using the PRISMA framework’, Support for Learning, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 43-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12285
Kansteiner, K., Stamann, C., Buhren, C. G. and Theurl, P. (2020) Professionelle Lerngemeinschaften als Entwicklungsinstrument im Bildungswesen, Weinheim: Beltz Verlagsgruppe.
Korthagen, F. A. J. (2017) ‘Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: towards professional development 3.0’, Teachers and Teaching, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 387-405, https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1211523
Korthagen, F. A. J., Greene, W. L. and Kim, Y. M., (eds.) (2013) Teaching and Learning from Within: A Core Reflection Approach to Quality and Inspiration in Education, London/New York: Routledge.
Korthagen, F. and Vasalos, A. (2005) ‘Levels in reflection: core reflection as a means to enhance professional development’, Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354060042000337093
Korthagen, F. and Vasalos, A. (2008) ‘Quality from within as the key to professional development’, Proceedings of the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA 2008), New York.
Kruse, S., Louis, K. S. and Bryk, A. S. (1995) ‘An Emerging Framework for Analyzing School-Based Professional Community’, in Louis, K. S., Kruse, S. D. and Associates (ed.), Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, pp. 23-44.
Lagrosen, Y. (2017) ‘The quality café: Developing the world café method for organizational learning by including quality management tools’, Total quality management and business excellence, Vol. 30, No. 13-14, pp. 1515-1527. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1377606
Lee, V. E. and Smith, J. B. (1996) ‘Collective Responsibility for Learning and Its Effects on Gains in Achievement for Early Secondary School Students’, American Journal of Education, Vol. 104, No. 2, pp. 103-147. https://doi.org/10.1086/444122
LoGerfo, L. F. and Goddard, R. D. (2008) ‘Defining, Measuring, and Validating Teacher and Collective Responsibility’, in Hoy, W. K. and DiPaola, M. F. (ed.), Improving schools: studies, in Leadership and culture, Charlotte, NC: Information Age, pp. 73–97.
Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M. and Kruse, S. (1996) ‘Teachers’ Professional Community in Restructuring Schools’, American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 757–798. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033004757
Midtsundstad, J. (in preparation) ‘The Intervention in the Innovation School-In’, in Dalehefte, I. M. and Midtsundstad, J. H. (ed.) School-In – A Systemic Approach to School Development – Technical Report, Münster: Waxmann.
Midtsundstad, J., Dalehefte, I. M., Hillen, S., Horrigmo, K. and Ingebrigtsvold Sæbø, G. (in preparation) ‘The Project School-In - An Overview’, in Dalehefte, I. M. and Midtsundstad, J. H. (eds.) School-In – A systemic Approach to School Development – Technical Report, Münster: Waxmann.
OECD (2015) Education Policy Outlook 2015: Making Reforms Happen. París: OECD Publishing.
Park, J.-H., Lee, I. H and Cooc, N. (2018) ’The Role of School-Level Mechanisms: How Principal Support, Professional Learning Communities, Collective Responsibility, and Group-Level Teacher Expectations Affect Student Achievement’, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 55, No. 5, pp. 742-780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18821355
Park, J.-H. and Byun, S.-Y. (2020) ‘Principal support, professional learning community, and group-level teacher expectations’, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1764061
Pedersen, P. M. (2010) ‘Om Jürgen Habermas’, in Pedersen, P. M. and Olesen, S. G. (ed.), Pædagogik i sociologisk perspektiv, 2nd ed, Aarhus: ViaSystime, pp. 144-164.
Resnick, L. B. (2010) ‘Nested Learning Systems for the Thinking Curriculum’, Educational Researcher, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 183-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10364671
Schaefer, M., Heinze, H.-J., Rotte M. and Denke, C. (2013) ‘Communicative versus Strategic Rationality: Habermas Theory of Communicative Action and the Social Brain’, PLoS ONE, Vol. 8, No. 5, e65111. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065111
School-In Consortium (2016) School-In. An innovation project about local school development, school culture, expectation structures and inclusion. Research proposal for the FINNUT program in public sector entities, Vennesla Municipality/University of Agder, Kristiansand.
Stoll, L. and Louis, K. (ed.) (2007) Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth, and dilemmas, London: Open University Press.
Trepke, F. (2014) Dokumentierte Entwicklungsprozesse - Dokumentieren und Reflektieren als Beitrag zur professionellen Weiterentwicklung von Grundschullehrkräften in SINUS an Grundschulen, [Dissertation], Kiel: IPN, Leibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik.
Vescio, V. (2020) ‘Professional learning communities the promise and possibilities’, in Kansteiner, K., Stamann, C., Buhren, C. G. and Theurl, P. (ed.), Professionelle Lerngemeinschaften als Entwicklungsinstrument im Bildungswesen, Weinheim: Beltz Verlagsgruppe, pp. 84-85.
Vescio, V., Ross, D. and Adams, A. (2008) ’A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning’, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
Wackerhausen, S. (2009) ‘Collaboration, Professional Identity, and Reflection Across Boundaries’, Journal of Interprofessional Care, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 455-473. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820902921720
Whalan, F. (2012) Collective responsibility: redefining what falls between the cracks for school reform, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-882-7_7
Zwart, R. C., Korthagen, F. A. J. and Attema-Noordewier, S. (2015) ‘A strength-based approach to teacher professional development’, Professional Development in Education, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 579-596, https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.919341
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Stefanie A. Hillen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors declare with this manuscript intended for publication to ERIES Journal that:
- all co-authors agree with the publication of the manuscript even after amendments arising from peer review;
- all co-authors agree with the posting of the full text of this work on the web page of ERIES Journal and to the inclusion of references in databases accessible on the internet;
- no results of other researchers were used in the submitted manuscript without their consent, proper citation, or acknowledgement of their cooperation or material provided;
- the results (or any part of them) used in the manuscript have not been sent for publication to any other journal nor have they already been published (or if so, that the relevant works are cited in this manuscript);
- submission of the manuscript for publication was completed in accordance with the publishing regulations pertaining to place of work;
- experiments performed comply with current laws and written consent of the Scientific Ethics Committee / National Animal Care Authority (as is mentioned in the manuscript submitted);
- grant holders confirm that they have been informed of the submitted manuscript and they agree to its publication.
Authors retain copyright and grant ERIES Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the published work with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. Moreover, authors are able to post the published work in an institutional repository with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. In addition, authors are permitted and encouraged to post the published work online (e.g. institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
