DEVELOPING TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHERS

  • Anna Carbová University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice
  • Lucie Betáková University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice
Keywords: EFL, ICT, secondary schools, teaching English, TPACK

Abstract

Integration of information and communication technology into other than Information Technology subjects taught at schools of all levels in the Czech Republic has become of great importance. As schools are equipped with information and communication technology (ICT) much better than ever before researchers have focused on the way they are used in the classes. Development of technology is fast and not all teachers from schools have undergone education on how to integrate technology into the teaching process. These are the reasons why it is necessary to find a system for training teachers in this field. We provided such a training course for secondary school English teachers. This article brings information about the impact of this course on one model teacher’s lessons. A questionnaire, which was specially developed for the purpose of evaluating technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), is introduced in this article. It assesses the TPACK development perceived by the teacher. We describe in detail how the new knowledge and skills reflect in her teaching. The results are demonstrated on the Technological pedagogical content knowledge framework.

References


  • Carbová, A. (2012) ‘How to Become a Technology-friendly Teacher: Discovering the Background of Role Model Teachers’, Mezinárodní konference ICT ve vzdělávání, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23-33, ISBN 978-80-244-3362-2.

  • Carbová, A., Betáková L. (2013) ‘Developing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of English Language Teachers’, Efficiency and Responsibility in Education, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 63-71, ISBN 978-80-213-2378-0

  • Chroust, G. (2008) ‘Knowledge in Education; a Process View’, Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 32-49, ISSN 1803-1617.

  • Keller, J.B., Hixton, E., Bonk, C.J., Ehman, L.H. (2008) Professional Development that Increases Technology Integration by K-12 Teachers: Influence of the TICKIT Program. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, vol. 5, no. 3, ISSN 1550-6908. [online]. Available: http://itdl.org/Journal/Mar_08/article01.htm [19 Jul 2012].

  • Knezek, G.A., Christensen, R. (1998) Teachers' Attitudes Toward Computers Questionnaire, [online]. Available: http://courseweb.unt.edu/gknezek/studies/survey/tacdesc.htm [19 Jul 2012].

  • Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P. (2008) ‘Introducing TPCK’, In: AACTE Commitee on Innovation and Technology (ed.) Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators. New York: Routledge. pp. 3-30, ISBN 978‑0‑8058‑6356‑7.

  • Koh, J.H.L., Divaharan, S. (2011) ‘Developing Pre-Service Teachers’ Technology Integration Expertise through the TPACK-developing Instructional Model’, Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 35-58, http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/EC.44.1.c

  • Moersch, C. (1995) Levels of Technology Implementation (LoTi): A framework for measuring classroom technology use. In: Learning and Leading with Technology. sine loco: International Sociaty for Technology in Education, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 40-42, ISSN 1082-5754.

  • Niess, M.L. (2011) ‘Investigating TPACK: Knowledge Growth in Teaching with Technology’, Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 299-317, DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/EC.44.3.c

  • Schmidt, D.A., Baran, A., Thompson, D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M., Shin, T.S. (2010) Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 123-149, ISSN 1539-1523. Available online: http://learnonline.canberra.edu.au/pluginfile.php/491591/mod_page/content/1/TPACK_UC/pdf/tpack4_preservice2.pdf

  • Shulman, L. (1987). ‘Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform’, Harvard Educational Review, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 1-22.

  • Staňková, D.M., Drdla, M. (2012) ‘Company Training from the Efficiency and Effectiveness Point of View’,  Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 10-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2012.050102

  • Tai, S.D. (2013) ‘From TPACK-in-Action Workshops to English Classrooms: CALL Competencies Developed and Adopted into Classroom Teaching’, Graduate Theses and Dissertations, Paper 13335.

  • Wong, L., Benson, P. (2006). ‘In-service CALL education: What happens after the course is over?’ In Hubbard, P., Levy M. (Eds.), ‘Teacher Education in CALL’. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 251-264.

  • Zounek, J., Šeďová, K. (2009) Učitelé a technologie: Mezi tradičním a moderním pojetím, Brno: Paido, ISBN 978‑80‑7315‑187‑4.

Published
2013-12-31
How to Cite
Carbová, A. and Betáková, L. (2013) ’DEVELOPING TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHERS’, Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 203-212. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2013.060401
Section
Research Paper