COMPARISON OF THE TEST VARIANTS IN ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS

  • Jindřich Klůfa University of Economics, Prague
Keywords: Entrance examinations, test variants, mathematics, statistical methods

Abstract

The paper contains an analysis of the differences of number of points in the test in mathematics between test variants, which were used in the entrance examinations at the Faculty of Business Administration at University of Economics in Prague in 2015. The differences may arise due to the varying difficulty of variants for students, but also because of the different level of knowledge of students who write these variants. This problem we shall study in present paper. The aim of this paper is to study dependence of the results of entrance examinations in mathematics on test variants. The results obtained will be used for further improvement of the admission process at University of Economics.

References


  • Anděl, J. (1978) Matematická statistika. Praha: SNTL/ALFA.

  • Brožová, H., Rydval, J. (2013) ‘Analysis of the exam test quality’, Efficiency and Responsibility in Education, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference, Prague, pp. 47–54.

  • Coufal, J., Tobíšek, J. (2015) ‘Mathematics and e-learning’, The 9th International Days of Statistics and Economics, Prague, pp.270-278.

  • Hošková-Majerová, Š., Račková, P. (2010) ‘Problematic examples at the entrance exams of mathematics at the University of Defence’,  Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 9, pp. 348–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.162

  • Hrubý, M. (2013) ‘Extended elements of the question objects’, Efficiency and Responsibility in Education, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference, Prague, pp. 204–209.

  • Kaspříková, N. (2012) ‘Data analysis of students' performance‘, Efficiency and Responsibility in Education,  Proceedings of the 9th International Conference, Prague, pp. 213–218.

  • Klůfa, J. (2012) ‘Tests from probability point of view‘, Efficiency and Responsibility in Education, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference, Prague, pp. 229–233.

  • Klůfa, J. (2013) ‘Comparison of entrance examinations in mathematics’, Efficiency and Responsibility in Education, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference, Prague, pp. 270–275.

  • Klůfa, J. (2015a) ‘Dependence of the Results of Entrance Examinations on Test Variants‘, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 174, pp. 3565–3571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1073

  • Klůfa, J. (2015b) ‘Analysis of entrance examinations’, Efficiency and Responsibility in Education, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference, Prague, pp. 250–256.

  • Klůfa, J. (2015c) ‘Comparison of the Ways of Acceptance Students at University’, Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 72–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2015.080204

  • Klůfa, J., Langhamrová, J. (2015) Matematika - příprava k přijímacím zkouškám na VŠE, Prague: Ekopress.

  • Klůfa, J. (2016) ‘Analysis of the differences between results of test variants’, Efficiency and Responsibility in Education, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference, Prague, pp. 279–285.

  • Kohanová, I. (2012) ‘Analysis of university entrance test from mathematics’, Acta Didactica Universitatis Comenianae Mathematics, vol. 12, pp.31-46.

  • Kučera, P., Svatošová, L., Pelikán, M. (2015) ‘University study results as related to the admission exam results‘ Efficiency and Responsibility in Education, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference, Prague, pp. 318–324.

  • Kubanová, J., Linda, B. (2012) ‘Relation between results of the learning potential tests and study results’, Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 125-134.  http://dx.doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2012.050302

  • Linda, B., Kubanová, J. (2013) ‘Relation between results of the entrance examination test in mathematics and examination in mathematics at the university’, Efficiency and Responsibility in Education, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference, Prague, pp. 370–373.

  • Marek, L. (2013) Statistika v příkladech, Prague: Professional Publishing.

  • Mošna, F. (2013) ‘E-learning and interactive dynamical figures for teaching of mathematics’, Efficiency and Responsibility in Education, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference, Prague, pp. 449–454.

  • Otavová, M., Sýkorová, I. (2014) ‘Analysis of Scores from Mid-Term and Final Test by a Contingency Table’, Efficiency and Responsibility in Education, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference, Prague, pp. 527–533.

  • Premadasa, I. (1993) ‘A reappraisal of the use of multiple-choice questions’, Medical Teacher, vol. 15, no. 2-3, pp. 237-242.

  • Rao, C.R. (1973) Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications, New York: John Wiley.

  • Zhao, Y. (2005) ‘Algorithms for converting raw scores of multiple-choice question tests to conventional percentage marks’, International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1189-1194.

  • Zhao, Y. (2006) ‘How to design and interpret a multiple-choice-question test: A probabilistic approach’, International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1281-1286.

Published
2016-12-15
How to Cite
Klůfa, J. (2016) ’COMPARISON OF THE TEST VARIANTS IN ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS’, Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 111-116. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2016.090404
Section
Research Paper