• Martin Flegl Universidad La Salle México
  • María Bertha Fortoul Ollivier Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad La Salle México, Ciudad de México, México
  • Václav Švec Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Jennie Brand Barajas Coordinación de Formación Docente, Universidad La Salle México, Ciudad de México, México.
  • Christian Vizuet Coordinación de Formación Docente, Universidad La Salle México, Ciudad de México, México.


La Salle University México (La Salle) uses an internal system of professors’ evaluation, which main purpose is to evaluate professors’ performance and secure high quality of teaching at all of its faculties. Since its inception in 2010, La Salle has obtained 517,635 individual evaluations of 45,346 courses. However, no additional analysis of the obtained results has ever been done. This article provides introductory analysis of the accumulated results at faculty level. The main objective is to analyze whether there are differences between faculties regarding the evaluation. Although the results are highly skewed towards the maximal evaluation at all faculties, there are statistically significant differences. The next important task is to investigate what factors influence the evaluation. Moreover, as this is the introductory analysis, the article concludes with possible future steps that should be consider regarding eventual structural changes in the evaluation system.


  • Basow, S.A. (2000) ‘Best and Worst Professors: Gender Patterns in Students' Choices’, Sex Roles, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 407-417.

  • Becker, W.E., Watts, M. (1999) ‘How departments of economics should evaluate teaching’, American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 344-349.

  • Bolívar, A. (2008) ‘Evaluación de la práctica docente. Una revisión desde España’, Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 57-74.

  • Braga, M., Paccagnella, M., Pellizzari, M. (2014) ‘Evaluating students’ evaluations of professors’, Economics of Education Review, vol. 41, pp. 71-88.

  • Brand Barajas, J. (2014) La evaluación de los coordinadores de programas académicos: una propuesta de indicadores. La evaluación educativa desde diversos espacios académicos, Universidad La Salle México, DeLaSalle ediciones, 1ra edición, México.

  • Coordinación de Formación Docente (2010) ‘Documento interno de trabajo’, Universidad La Salle México, México.

  • Felton, J., Koper, P.T., Mitchell, J., Stinson, M. (2008) ‘Attractiveness, easiness and other issues: student evaluations of professors on’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 45-61.

  • Flegl, M., Roa Rivas, K.X., Vergara Abascal Sherwell, G., Monroy Jiménez, M.A. (2017) ‘On alternative methodology for increasing discrimination ability in system of professors’ evaluation’, Proceedings of Efficiency and Responsibility in Education (ERIE) 2017, pp. 72-79.

  • Games, P.A., Howell, J.F. (1976) ‘Pair wise multiple comparison procedures with unequal n's and/or variances’, Journal of Educational Statistics, vol 1., no. 2, pp. 113-125.

  • Hein, N., Kroenke, A., Rodrigues Júnior, M.M. (2015) ‘Professor Assessment Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis’, Procedia Computer Science, vol. 55, pp. 539:548.

  • La Salle (2017) Modelo Educativo - Universidad La Salle, Ciudad de México, [Online], Available: [11 May 2017].

  • La Salle (2016) Quinto INFORME del Rector 2015-2016, Universidad La Salle México, México.

  • Langbein, L. (2008) ‘Management by results: Student evaluation of faculty teaching and the mis-measurement of performance’, Economics of Education Review, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 417-428.

  • Leung, X.Y., Jiang, L., Busser, J. (2013) ‘Online student evaluations of hospitality professors: A cross-cultural comparison’, Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 36–46.

  • Marsh, H.W., Roche, L. (1993) ‘The Use of Students' Evaluations and an Individually Structured Intervention to Enhance University Teaching Effectiveness’, American Educational Research Journal, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 217-251.

  • Marsh, H.W., Roche, L. (2000) ‘Effects of Grading Leniency and Low Workload on Students' Evaluations of Teaching: Popular Myth, Bias, Validity, or Innocent Bystanders?’, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 202-228.

  • McAuley, J.W., Backo, J.L., Sobota, K.F., Metzger, A.H., Ulbrich, T. (2017). ‘Identifying motivators and barriers to student completion of instructor evaluations: A multi-faceted, collaborative approach from four colleges of pharmacy’, Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 20-27.

  • Santibañez, L. (2006) ‘Why we should care if teachers get A's: Teacher test scores and students achievement in Mexico’, Economics of Education Review, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 510-520.

  • Silva, K.M., Silva, J.F., Quinn, M.A., Draper, J.N., Cover, K.R., Munoff, A.A. (2008) ‘Rate My Professor: Online Evaluations of Psychology Instructors’, Teaching of Psychology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 71-80.

  • Triola, M.F. (2012) Elementary Statistics, 12th edition, Pearson.

  • Wendorf, C.A., Alexander, S. (2005) ‘The influence of individual- and class-level fairness-related perceptions on student satisfaction’, Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 190-206.

How to Cite
Flegl, M.; Fortoul Ollivier, M.; Švec, V.; Brand Barajas, J.; Vizuet, C. (2017) 'ANALYSIS OF PROFESSORS’ EVALUATION AT LA SALLE UNIVERSITY MÉXICO FROM 2010 TO 2016: WHAT THE RESULTS INDICATE?', Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 76-85.
Research Paper