• Martin Flégl Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
  • Ivana Tichá Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
  • Lucie Kvasničková Stanislavská Czech University of Life Sciences Prague



DEA model, Education, Efficiency, Innovation, OPPA, Ph.D. Student, Research and Development


Research results and university performance measures have been frequently discussed topic in the Czech higher education system. Performance can be improved by establishing innovations in education in many areas. At higher education sector the performance within research activities is of the same importance. Various authorities have been making an effort to establish a set of measures to assess research performance at institutional level. This paper focuses on the assessment of research activity within an institution – the Faculty of Economics and Management (FEM), Czech University of Life Sciences (CULS) Prague – with the use of Data Envelopment Analysis model (DEA). The measured units (DMUs) are 12 FEM departments. Based on the findings revealed by the DEA model application various measures adopted by the faculty in order to improve research and education performance are introduced. Following the widespread trend in many countries the focus of the effort is in training of university teachers and students. This aim is being partially accomplished by the Project Operational Program Prague – Adaptability (OPPA), which is focused on the innovation of the Ph.D. studies at the FEM. The main project aims are i) to improve students’ research experiences, ii) to provide appropriate conditions for Ph.D. students at the departments/faculty and iii) to launch tools for better communication among Ph.D. students and their supervisors.


  • Abrami, P.C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B. (2004) ‘Teacher motivation to implement an educational innovation: Factors differentiating users and non-users of cooperative learning’, Educational Psychology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 201-216.

  • Angrist, J., Lavy, V. (2002) ‘New evidence on classroom computers and pupil learning‘, Economic Journal, vol. 112, no. 482, pp. 735-765. http:/

  • Atkinson, A., Burgess, S., Croxson, B., Gregg, P., Propper, C., Slater, H., et al. (2009) ‘Evaluating the impact of performance-related pay for teachers in England’, Labour Economics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 251-261.

  • Buddin, R., Zamarro, G. (2009) ‘Teacher qualifications and student achievement in urban elementary schools’, Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 103-115.

  • Call (2011) ‘Výzva pro prioritní osu 3 Modernizace počátečního vzdělávání‘, HLAVNÍ MĚSTO PRAHA. Operační program Praha - Adaptabilita [online]. 2011 [cit. 2012-11-13]. Avaivable:

  • Clotfelter, C.T., Ladd, H.F., Vigdor, J.L. (2007) ‘Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects’, Economics of Education Review, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 673-682.

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2003) ‘The role of the universities in the Europe of knowledge’, Brussels 5-02-2003.

  • CULS (2012) ‘Doktorské Studium/PhD studies’ [online]. 2007 [cit. 2012-11-27]. Avaivable:

  • CULS (2011). “Výroční zpráva o činnosti 2011/Rector’s Report 2011”, Avaivable:

  • Drucker, P.F. (1985) ‘Innovation and Entrepreneurship’, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.

  • FEM (2010). “Motivační Program pro Pracovníky a Doktorandy/Motivation Programme for Academic Stuff and Ph.D. Students”, Internal Document of the Faculty of Economics and Management.

  • FEM (2012) ‘Doktorské Studium/PhD studies’ [online]. 2007 [cit. 2012-11-27]. Avaivable:

  • FI MUNI (2012) ‘Projekt Inovace doktorského studia na Fakulte informatiky Masarykovy univerzity/Project of Innovation of Doctoral study at the Faculty of Informatics at Masaryk University’ [online]. 2008 [cit. 2012-12-19]. Avaivable:

  • FSS CU (2012) ‘Inovace doktorského studia na Fakultě sociálních věd Univerzity Karlovy v Praze/Innovation of doctoral study at the Faculty of Social Sciences at Charles University’ [online]. 2010 [cit. 2012-12-19]. Avaivable:

  • Fuchs, T., Woessmann, L. (2007) ‘What accounts for international differences in student performance? A re-examination using PISA data’, Empirical Economics, vol. 32, no. 2-3, pp. 433-464.

  • Gibbs, G., Coffey, M. (2004) ‘The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students’, Active Learning in Higher Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 87-100.

  • Gunday, G., Ulusov, G., Kilic, K., Alpkan, L. (2011) ‘Effects of innovation types on firm performance’, International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 662-676.

  • Haelermans, C., Blank, J.L.T. (2012) ‘Is a schools’ performance related to technical change? – A study on the relationship between innovations and secondary school productivity’, Computers & Education, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 884-892.

  • Haelermans, C., de Witte, K. (2012) ‘The role of innovations in secondary school performance – Evidence from a conditional efficiency model‘, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 223, no. 2, pp. 541-549.

  • Kingdom, G.G., Teal, F. (2006) ‘Does performance related pay for teachers improve student performance? Some evidence from India’, Economics of Education Review, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 473-486.

  • Könings, K.D., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merriënboer, J.G. (2007) ‘Teachers’ perspectives on innovations: Implications for educational design‘, Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 985-997.

  • Lavy, V. (2009) ‘Performance Pay and Teachers’ Effort, Productivity, and Grading Ethics’, American Economic Review, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 1979-2011.

  • Nii, L.J., Chin, A. (1996) ‘Comparative trial of problem-based learning versus didactic lectures on clerkship performance’, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, vol. 60, pp. 162-164.

  • OECD Oslo Manual (2005) ‘Guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data’, 3rd edition, Paris.

  • OPPA (2009) ‘Zaměření prioritní osy 3 - Modernizace počátečního vzdělávání‘, HLAVNÍ MĚSTO PRAHA. Operační program Praha - Adaptabilita [online]. 2009 [cit. 2012-11-13]. Avaivable:

  • OPPA (2012) ‘Operační program Praha – Adaptabilita: Více důvodů cítit se tady jako doma‘, HLAVNÍ MĚSTO PRAHA. Operační program Praha - Adaptabilita [online]. 2012 [cit. 2012-11-13]. Avaivable:

  • Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Nevgi, A. (2007) ‘The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education’, Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 557-571.

  • PUO (2012) ‘Inovace studia historických věd na Univerzitě Palackého/Study Innovations of Historical Sciences at Palacký University Olomouc’ [online]. 2008 [cit. 2012-12-19]. Avaivable:

  • Queen, S. (2009) ‘Effect on cooperative learning and traditional strategies on academic performance in Middle school language arts, Wladen University, Mineapolis, Minnesota.

  • RVVI (2010) ‘Metodika hodnocení výsledků výzkumných organizací/Methods for evaluating R&D results’, [Online], Available: [12 April 2012].

  • Scheel, H. (2000) 'EMS: Efficiency Measurement System', [Online], Available: [12 April 2012].

  • Staub, F.C. (2004) ‘Transforming educational theory into usable knowledge: A case of co-constructing tools for lesson design and reflection’, Quality in practice-oriented research in science education, pp. 41-52.

  • UHK (2012) ‘Inovace doktorského studijního programu ICT ve vzdělávání/ Innovation of doctoral study program ICT in education’ [online]. 2011 [cit. 2012-12-19]. Avaivable:

  • van Eekelen, I.M. (2005) ‘Teachers’ will and way to learn: Studies on how teachers learn and their willingness to do so’, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Maastricht University.

  • Additional Files



    How to Cite

    Flégl, M., Tichá, I. and Kvasničková Stanislavská, L. (2013) ’INNOVATION OF DOCTORAL STUDIES AT THE FEM CULS PRAGUE’, Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 265-280



    Research Paper