Evaluation of the Quality of Teaching from the Perspective of University Students
The concept of quality in tertiary education is important not only for education providers but also for society as a whole which expects the education to have a high level of quality and wants to maintain its trust in the education system on the national and international level. The objective of this paper is therefore to identify variables that, from the perspective of university students, affect the quality of taught courses, and use the results to formulate recommendations that would improve the quality of teaching at universities. Primary data was obtained through a quantitative survey among students in the Master’s programme at a selected public university involving 450 respondents. The results showed that the overall rating of a course is more strongly influenced by variables related to the course’s outcome, content and concept than the rating of the teacher. The main value lies in the general overview of the variables influencing the perception of the quality of taught courses by students that is beneficial for teachers who are preparing a course and also for higher education institutions developing a methodology for evaluating the quality of teaching and teachers.
- Adnot, M., Dee, T., Katz, V. and Wyckoff, J. (2017) ‘Teacher Turnover, Teacher Quality, and Student Achievement in DCPS’, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 54-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0162373716663646
- Alauddin, M. and Kifle, T. (2014) ‘Does the student evaluation of teaching instrument really measure instructors’ teaching effectiveness? An econometric analysis of students’ perceptions in economics courses’, Economic Analysis and Policy, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2014.05.009
- Arsenijević, J. and Maljković, M. (2016) ‘Teachers’ Roles in Relation to the Ownership Structure of a Faculty’, Procedia Technology, Vol. 22, pp. 1152-1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.01.162
- Bowen, H. R. (ed.) (2018) Investment in Learning – The Individual and Social Value of American Education, New York: Routledge.
- Chui, T. B., Ahmad, M. S., Bassim, F. A. and Zaimi, N. A. (2016) ‘Evaluation of Service Quality of Private Higher Education Using Service Improvement Matrix’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 224, pp. 132-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.417
- Devadoss, S. and Foltz, J. (1996) ‘Evaluation of Factors Influencing Student Class Attendance and Performance’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 499-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1243268
- De Vaus, D. (2014) Surveys in Social Research, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
- Dolton, P., Marcenaro, O. D. and Navarro, L. (2003) ‘The effective use of student time: a stochastic frontier production function case study’, Economics of Education Review, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 547-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(03)00027-X
- Ďurišová, M., Kucharčíková, A. and Tokarčíková, E. (2015) ‘Assessment of Higher Education Teaching Outcomes (Quality of Higher Education)’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 174, pp. 2497-2502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.922
- El-Hilali, N., Al-Jaber, S. and Hussein, L. (2015) ‘Students’ Satisfaction and Achievement and Absorption Capacity in Higher Education’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 177, pp. 420-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.384
- Government Regulation no. 274/2016 Coll., on Standards for Accreditation in Higher Education, Prague: Minister of Education, Youth and Sports.
- Higher Education Institutions and on Amendments and Supplements to Some Other Acts (the Higher Education Act) No. 111/1998 Coll, Prague: Ministry of the Interior.
- Hoang, T. P., Trong, B. Q., Tuan, N. K. and Linh, L. H. (2016) ‘Factors Affecting Learners’ Satisfaction towards Quality of English Certification Training Services in Vietnam: A Case Study in Ho Minnh City, Vietnam’, International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 286-298.
- Keane, M. (2015) ‘Responsibility for Learning: An Inclusive Approach to Learning and Teaching Evaluation in Higher Education’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 167, pp. 28-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.638
- Leeuwenkamp, K. J. G., Brinke, D. J. and Kester, L. (2017) ‘Assessment quality in tertiary education: An integrative literature review’, Studies in Educational Evaluation, Vol. 55, pp. 94-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.08.001
- Lesjak, D. (2018) ‘Improving Higher Education (Institutions) with the Matrix of Managerial and Financial Objectives’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 238, pp. 249-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2018.03.030
- Lindstadt, M. A. (2005) ‘Employing mediation to approach truants’, Family Court Review, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 303-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00031.x
- McCluskey, C. P., Bynum, T. S. and Patchin, J. W. (2004) ‘Reducing Chronic Absenteeism: an Assessment of an Early Truancy Initiative’, Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 214-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011128703258942
- Medallon, M. C. and Martinez, G. O. (2014) ‘Teaching Effectiveness and Student’s Learning Acquisition in Selected Major Courses in the International Tourism and Hospitality Management Program’, Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 131-138.
- Ming, J. S. K. (2010) ‘Institutional Factors Influencing Students’ College Choice Decision in Malaysia: A Conceptual Framework’, International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 53-58.
- Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (2015) Higher Education Development Framework for 2020, [Online], Available: http://www.vzdelavani2020.cz/images_obsah/dokumenty/ramec_vs.pdf [11 Jul 2018].
- Nada, S. and Hamed, M. (2018) ‘Students Feedback for Faculty Education Development in Developing Countries: An Egyptian Sample’, International Journal of Education and Information Technology, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 31-45.
- Orindaru, A. (2015) ‘Changing Perspectives on Students in Higher Education’, Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 27, pp. 682-691. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01049-7
- Pawłowski, K. (2009) ‘The ‘Fourth Generation University’ as a Creator of the Local and Regional Development’, Higher Education in Europe, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 51-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720902747017
- Pereira, C. A, Araujo, J. F. E. A. and Machado-Taylor, M. L. (2018) ‘The Brazilian higher education evaluation model: “SINAES” sui generis?’, International Journal of Educational Development, Vol. 61, pp. 5-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.11.007
- Prisacariu, A. (2015) ‘New Perspectives of Quality Assurance in European Higher Education’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 180, pp. 119-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.094
- Rafaila, E. and Duta, N. (2015) ‘Teaching and Self-teaching in Higher Education’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 197, pp. 1230-1235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.384
- Scott, P., Gallacher, J. and Parry, G. (2017) New languages and landscapes of higher education, Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
- Stanca, L. (2006) ‘The Effects of Attendance on Academic Performance: Panel Data Evidence for Introductory Microeconomics’, The Journal of Economic Education, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 251-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JECE.37.3.251-266
- Stronge, J. H. (2018) Qualities of effective teachers, Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD.
- Wiese, M., Van Heerden, C. H. and Jordaan, Y. (2010) ‘The role of demographics in students’ selection of higher education institution’, ACTA Commercii – Independent research journal in the management sciences, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 150-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ac.v10i1.124
Copyright (c) 2019 Martina Fejfarová, Adéla Fajčíková
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors declare with this manuscript intended for publication to ERIES Journal that:
- all co-authors agree with the publication of the manuscript even after amendments arising from peer review;
- all co-authors agree with the posting of the full text of this work on the web page of ERIES Journal and to the inclusion of references in databases accessible on the internet;
- no results of other researchers were used in the submitted manuscript without their consent, proper citation, or acknowledgement of their cooperation or material provided;
- the results (or any part of them) used in the manuscript have not been sent for publication to any other journal nor have they already been published (or if so, that the relevant works are cited in this manuscript);
- submission of the manuscript for publication was completed in accordance with the publishing regulations pertaining to place of work;
- experiments performed comply with current laws and written consent of the Scientific Ethics Committee / National Animal Care Authority (as is mentioned in the manuscript submitted);
- grant holders confirm that they have been informed of the submitted manuscript and they agree to its publication.
Authors retain copyright and grant ERIES Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the published work with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. Moreover, authors are able to post the published work in an institutional repository with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. In addition, authors are permitted and encouraged to post the published work online (e.g. institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.