COMMUNITIES OF PRACTICE IN UNIVERSITY: A PRELIMINARY STUDY
Keywords:
Communities of Practice, Education, Knowledge Sharing, Students, CULS, FEMAbstract
There has been a lot written about the benefits of communities of practice (CoP) in university. The benefit of the communities of practice was described with respect to teachers’ qualification and teaching competencies influencing students implicitly as well as to areas related to the students themselves. Many studies prove the fact that the process of learning is of a social character (e.g. Lave, Wenger, 1991). That is why the communities of practice present suitable environment for collaborative learning which makes the process of generating, sharing and storing knowledge easier. The present paper defines on a theoretical level the concept of the communities of practice and moreover, provides a brief overview of the latest research in the communities of practice with regard to education. Another part of the article focuses on the pre-research of the communities of practice at Faculty of Economics and Management (FEM) Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CULS). Although the authors conform with the opinion that the communities of practice are a natural feature and spontaneously develop wherever there is a need for sharing implicit or tacit knowledge, the pre-research focused on the verification of this premise in order to continue in the research of a quantitative character. The existence of the communities of practice was verified on the basis of fundamental characteristics following Wenger’s model. Other characteristics, considered significant in relation to the communities of practice by McDermott were also investigated. Based on a group interview the existence of the communities of practice of the students at FEM at CULS has been verified and a conceptual model was created. The determined work prerequisites will be investigated in another phase of the research.
References
Andrew, N., Ferguson, D., Wilkie, G., Corcoran, T., Simson, H. (2009). ‘Developing professional identity in nursing academics: The role of communities of practice’ , Nurse Education Today, vol. 29, no. 6, August, pp. 607–611.
Chang C.K., Chen, G.D., Li, L.Y. (2008) ‘Constructing a community of practice to improve coursework activity’, Computers & Education, vol. 50, pp. 235-247.
Collinson, C., Parcella, G. (2004) Learning to fly. Chichester: Capstone Publishing Limited.
Fontaine, M.F., Millen, D.R. (2004) Understanding the Benefits and impact of Communities of Practice. Chapter to be in Knowledge Networks: Innovation through Communities of Practice. Eds. Paul Hildreth and Chris Kimble. Idea Group Publishing.
Hasanali, F., Hubert, C., Lopez, K., Newhouse, B., O´Dell, C., Vestal, W. (2002) Communities of Practice. APQC.
He An E. (2009) ‘Bridging the gap between teacher educator and teacher in a community of practice: A case of brokering’, System, vol. 37, pp. 153–163.
Hezemans, M., Ritzen, M. (2005) ‘Communities of Practice in Higher Education, Information and Communication Technologies and Real-Life Learning’, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol. 182, pp. 39-46, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25997-X_5.
Jančaříková, K. and Scholleová, H. (2010) ‘Methodology for team member selection for the need of work in course of daily and distance learning education’, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education (ERIE 2010), Prague, pp. 94-101.
Lave, J. And Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lesser, E.L., Storck, J. (2001) ‘Communities of practice and organizational performance’ [online], IBM SYSTEMS JOURNAL, vol. 4. Available: http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/404/lesser.pdf [2 Jan 2009].
McDermott, R. (1999) Nurturing Three Dimensional Communities of practice: How to get the most out of human network. The Dimensions of Community [online], Available: http://www.impactalliance.org/file_download.php?location=S_U&filename=10143108940OPDimensions.pdf [2 Jan 2009].
McDermott, R. (2000) ‘Knowing in Community: 10 Critical Success Factors in Building Communities of Practice’, IHRIM Journal, vol. IV-1.
Roberts, J. (2006) ‘Limits to communities of practice’. Journal of Management Studies, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 623-639.
Tharenou, P., Donohue, R., Cooper, B. (2000) Management research methods, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thrysoe, L., Hounsgaard, L., Bonderup Dohn, N., Wagner, L. (2010) ‘Participating in a community of practice as a prerequisite for becoming a nurse e Trajectories as final year nursing students’, Nurse Education in Practice, vol. 10, pp. 361–366.
Vesico, V., Ross, D., Adams, A. (2008) ‘A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning’, Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 24, pp. 80-91.
von Krogh, G., Ichijo K., Nonaka, I. (2000) Enabling Knowledge Creation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wenger, E. (2004) ‘Knowledge management as a doughnut: Shaping your knowledge strategy through communities of practice’ [online], IVEY BUSINESS JOURNAL, Available: http://home.att.net/~discon/KM/CoPOverview.pdf [2 Jan 2009].
Wenger, E. (2005) Communities of practice a brief introduction [online], Available: http://home.att.net/~discon/KM/CoPOverview.pdf [6 Jan 2009].
Wenger, E., Mcdermott, R., Snyder, W.M. (2002) Cultivating Communities of Practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
Wilson, B.L., Wilson, J., Peluso, C., Priest, J., Speer, T. (2009) ‘Student satisfaction and team development outcomes with preassigned learning communities’, Journal of Professional Nursing, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 15-22.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors declare with this manuscript intended for publication to ERIES Journal that:
- all co-authors agree with the publication of the manuscript even after amendments arising from peer review;
- all co-authors agree with the posting of the full text of this work on the web page of ERIES Journal and to the inclusion of references in databases accessible on the internet;
- no results of other researchers were used in the submitted manuscript without their consent, proper citation, or acknowledgement of their cooperation or material provided;
- the results (or any part of them) used in the manuscript have not been sent for publication to any other journal nor have they already been published (or if so, that the relevant works are cited in this manuscript);
- submission of the manuscript for publication was completed in accordance with the publishing regulations pertaining to place of work;
- experiments performed comply with current laws and written consent of the Scientific Ethics Committee / National Animal Care Authority (as is mentioned in the manuscript submitted);
- grant holders confirm that they have been informed of the submitted manuscript and they agree to its publication.
Authors retain copyright and grant ERIES Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the published work with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. Moreover, authors are able to post the published work in an institutional repository with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. In addition, authors are permitted and encouraged to post the published work online (e.g. institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
