EVALUATION OF RESULTS IN CHOSEN SUBJECTS AND ANALYSIS OF THE MOTIVATION OF ADULT STUDENTS
The university studies of adult people in the combined or distance form of study denotes many differences in comparison with the regular studies. Very important question is if the results of the distance students are on the same level as those of regular students. The Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague has steadily high number of combined students in tutorial centres outside Prague. The contribution is based on an inquiry survey among the students of tutorial centres. Another data source is the official database of the university. The level of satisfaction of students was compared with their results and a negative dependency was found. We also investigated the relation between socio demographic characteristics and the motivation and attitude to the study. We found dependencies in three questions. Finally, we compare the results of the students from the tutorial centers and regular students and have not found remarkable differences. The good (not worse) results of students from the centers of distance studies can be explained by more intensive motivation which implies more intensive and more responsible preparation for exams. For the statistical analysis we used the software SPSS, version 18.
- Abbot, R.D., Perkins, D. (1982) ‘Reliability and Validity Evidence for Scales Measuring Dimensions of Student Rating of Instruction’, Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 42, pp. 563-569.
- Baylari, A., Montazer, G.A. (2009) ‘Design a personalized e-learning system based on item response theory and artificial neural network approach’, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 8013-8021.
- Berk, R.A. (1979) ‘The Construction of Rating Instruments for Faculty Evaluation’, Journal of Higher Education, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 650-669.
- Chang, F.C. (2002) ‘Intelligent assessment of distance learning’, Information Science, vol. 140, no. 1-2, pp. 105-125.
- Depew, K.E., Lettner-Rust H. (2009) ‘Mediating Power: Distance Learning Interfaces, Classroom Epistemology, and the Gaze’, Computers and Composition, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 174-189.
- Dömeová, L., Beránková, M., Houška, M. (2010) ‘Computer supported knowledge in distance learning’, In Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering ICSTE 2010, San Juan, pp. 181-184.
- Eccles, R.G. (1991) ‘The performance measurement manifesto’, Harvard Business Review, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 131–137.
- Marsh, H.W. (1985) ‘Students´ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility’, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 707-754.
- Overall, J.U., Marsh, H.W. (1980) ‘Students´ Evalutions of Instruction: A Longitudinal Study of Their Stability’, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 321-325.
- Ozkan, S.I., Koseler, R. (2009) ‘Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation’, Computers & Education, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 125-129.
- Poláčková, J., Jindrová, A. (2010) ‘Innovative approach to education and teaching of statistics’, Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science An international peer-reviewed journal published by Faculty of Economics and Management Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 14-27.
- Řezanková, H. (2007) Analysis of data from the survey. Professional Publishing Praha. (in Czech)
- Vostrá-Vydrová, H., Jindrová, A., Dömeová, L. (2011) ‘The attitude of adult students towards particular subjects, their motivation and results’, In Proceedings of the international conference ERIE 2011, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, pp. 341-350.
- Vydrová, H., Dömeová, L., Jindrová, A. (2010) ‘Women in distance studies’, In Proceedings of the international conference ERIE 2010, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, pp 275-282.
Authors declare with this manuscript intended for publication to ERIES Journal that:
- all co-authors agree with the publication of the manuscript even after amendments arising from peer review;
- all co-authors agree with the posting of the full text of this work on the web page of ERIES Journal and to the inclusion of references in databases accessible on the internet;
- no results of other researchers were used in the submitted manuscript without their consent, proper citation, or acknowledgement of their cooperation or material provided;
- the results (or any part of them) used in the manuscript have not been sent for publication to any other journal nor have they already been published (or if so, that the relevant works are cited in this manuscript);
- submission of the manuscript for publication was completed in accordance with the publishing regulations pertaining to place of work;
- experiments performed comply with current laws and written consent of the Scientific Ethics Committee / National Animal Care Authority (as is mentioned in the manuscript submitted);
- grant holders confirm that they have been informed of the submitted manuscript and they agree to its publication.
Authors retain copyright and grant ERIES Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the published work with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. Moreover, authors are able to post the published work in an institutional repository with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. In addition, authors are permitted and encouraged to post the published work online (e.g. institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.