AN ATTEMPT ON NEW SYSTEMATIZATION OF WORK MOTIVATION THEORIES
Keywords:Work motivation, theories, semiotic analysis, systematization
The paper deals with a semiotic analysis of work motivation theories developed in the second half of the twentieth century. These theories stem from different theoretical backgrounds, varying in ideas as well as in their impact to work motivation reality. For a student approaching this field it might seem to provide an overwhelming situation in an area of study filled with contradictory theories. The method used in this study is similar to one historians use when analysing development in a human society - semiotic analysis. Based on the historical analysis, an analysis of ideas and clusters of meanings follows. Authors assume that personal experience might determine individual motivation factors. It is quite clear, that on the biological level the processes of motivation should be the same in all humans. However, stimuli or conditions under which the processes of motivation are commenced might be caused by the personal experience of the individuals concerned. Authors believe that the above mentioned analysis of clusters of meaning could help us to better systemize the wide range of work motivation theories and make it more evident for all students of the field.
Adams, J.S. (1965) ‘Inequity in social exchange’. In: Berkowitz, I. (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 69, pp. 334-45.
Alderfer, C.P. (1972) Existence, Relatedness and Growth: Human need in organizational settings. New York: Free Press.
Ahearne, M.M., Mathieu, J., Rapp, A. (2005) ‘To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance’, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 945-955.
Bartlett, F.C. (1948) ‘Men, machines, and productivity’, Occupational Psychology, vol. 22, pp. 190-196.
Chen, G., Kirkman, B.L., Kanfer, R., Alen, D., Rosen, B. (2007) ‘A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment and performance in teams’, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 331-346.
Eco, U. (1976) Theory of Semiotics. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
Hackman, J.R., Oldham, G.R. (1980) Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J. (2005) Cultures and Organizations. Software of the Mind. London: McGraw Hill.
Kolman, L. (2001) Motivation and attributive processes. Agrární perspektivy X., Praha: ČZU, September 2001.
Locke, E.A. et al. (1981) ‘Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980’, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 90, pp. 125-52.
Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P. (2004) ‘What should we do about motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 388-403.
Latham, G.P., Ernst, C.T. (2006) ‘Keys to motivating tomorrows workforce’, Human Resources Management Review, vol. 16, pp. 181-198.
Masuda, A.D., Poelmans, S.A.Y., Allen, T.D., Lapierre, L.M., Cooper, C.L., Abarca, N., Brough, P., Ferreiro, P., Fraile, G. (2012) ‘Flexible work arrangements avalaibility and their relationship with work-to-family conflict, job satisfaction and turnover intensions: A comparison of three country clusters’, Applied Psychology, vol. 61, pp. 1-29.
Mathieu, J.E., Gilson, L.L., Ruddy, T.M. (2006) ‘Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated Model’, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 97-108.
McClelland, D.C. (1961) The Achieving Society. New York: Van Nostrand.
McGregor, D. (1960) The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw Hill.
Michálek, P., Chamoutová, H.., Kolman, L., Chamoutová, K., Rymešová, P. (2006) ‘Motivace pracovní činnosti a kvalita života při práci na českém venkově – část II.’ (Work motivation and work life quality in the Czech countryside – part II.) Psychologie v ekonomické praxi, XLI, pp. 185-191.
Myers, L.A., Jr. (2011) ‘One Hundred Years Later: What Woul Frederick W. Taylor Say?’ International Journal of Business and Social Science, vol. 2, no. 20, pp. 8-11.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Paine, J.B., Bachrach, D.G. (2000) ‘Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research’, Journal of Management, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 513-563.
Thomson, A. (1996) La Mettrie: Machine Man and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Vroom, V.H. (1964): Work and Motivation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Weber, M. (1976) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Wosnitza, M. et al. (2009) Contemporary motivation research: From global to local perspectives. Ashland: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.
How to Cite
Authors declare with this manuscript intended for publication to ERIES Journal that:
- all co-authors agree with the publication of the manuscript even after amendments arising from peer review;
- all co-authors agree with the posting of the full text of this work on the web page of ERIES Journal and to the inclusion of references in databases accessible on the internet;
- no results of other researchers were used in the submitted manuscript without their consent, proper citation, or acknowledgement of their cooperation or material provided;
- the results (or any part of them) used in the manuscript have not been sent for publication to any other journal nor have they already been published (or if so, that the relevant works are cited in this manuscript);
- submission of the manuscript for publication was completed in accordance with the publishing regulations pertaining to place of work;
- experiments performed comply with current laws and written consent of the Scientific Ethics Committee / National Animal Care Authority (as is mentioned in the manuscript submitted);
- grant holders confirm that they have been informed of the submitted manuscript and they agree to its publication.
Authors retain copyright and grant ERIES Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the published work with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. Moreover, authors are able to post the published work in an institutional repository with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. In addition, authors are permitted and encouraged to post the published work online (e.g. institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.