AN ATTEMPT ON NEW SYSTEMATIZATION OF WORK MOTIVATION THEORIES

Authors

  • Luděk Kolman Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
  • Hana Chýlová Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
  • Richard Selby Czech University of Life Sciences Prague

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2012.050204

Keywords:

Work motivation, theories, semiotic analysis, systematization 

Abstract

The paper deals with a semiotic analysis of work motivation theories developed in the second half of the twentieth century. These theories stem from different theoretical backgrounds, varying in ideas as well as in their impact to work motivation reality. For a student approaching this field it might seem to provide an overwhelming situation in an area of study filled with contradictory theories. The method used in this study is similar to one historians use when analysing development in a human society - semiotic analysis. Based on the historical analysis, an analysis of ideas and clusters of meanings follows. Authors assume that personal experience might determine individual motivation factors. It is quite clear, that on the biological level the processes of motivation should be the same in all humans. However, stimuli or conditions under which the processes of motivation are commenced might be caused by the personal experience of the individuals concerned. Authors believe that the above mentioned analysis of clusters of meaning could help us to better systemize the wide range of work motivation theories and make it more evident for all students of the field.

References

Adams, J.S. (1965) ‘Inequity in social exchange’. In: Berkowitz, I. (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 69, pp. 334-45.

Alderfer, C.P. (1972) Existence, Relatedness and Growth: Human need in organizational settings. New York: Free Press.

Ahearne, M.M., Mathieu, J., Rapp, A. (2005) ‘To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance’, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 945-955.

Bartlett, F.C. (1948) ‘Men, machines, and productivity’, Occupational Psychology, vol. 22, pp. 190-196.

Chen, G., Kirkman, B.L., Kanfer, R., Alen, D., Rosen, B. (2007) ‘A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment and performance in teams’, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 331-346.

Eco, U. (1976) Theory of Semiotics. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

Hackman, J.R., Oldham, G.R. (1980) Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J. (2005) Cultures and Organizations. Software of the Mind. London: McGraw Hill.

Kolman, L. (2001) Motivation and attributive processes. Agrární perspektivy X., Praha: ČZU, September 2001.

Locke, E.A. et al. (1981) ‘Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980’, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 90, pp. 125-52.

Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P. (2004) ‘What should we do about motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 388-403.

Latham, G.P., Ernst, C.T. (2006) ‘Keys to motivating tomorrows workforce’, Human Resources Management Review, vol. 16, pp. 181-198.

Masuda, A.D., Poelmans, S.A.Y., Allen, T.D., Lapierre, L.M., Cooper, C.L., Abarca, N., Brough, P., Ferreiro, P., Fraile, G. (2012) ‘Flexible work arrangements avalaibility and their relationship with work-to-family conflict, job satisfaction and turnover intensions: A comparison of three country clusters’, Applied Psychology, vol. 61, pp. 1-29.

Mathieu, J.E., Gilson, L.L., Ruddy, T.M. (2006) ‘Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated Model’, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 97-108.

McClelland, D.C. (1961) The Achieving Society. New York: Van Nostrand.

McGregor, D. (1960) The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw Hill.

Michálek, P., Chamoutová, H.., Kolman, L., Chamoutová, K., Rymešová, P. (2006) ‘Motivace pracovní činnosti a kvalita života při práci na českém venkově  –  část II.’ (Work motivation and work life quality in the Czech countryside – part II.) Psychologie v ekonomické praxi, XLI, pp. 185-191.

Myers, L.A., Jr. (2011) ‘One Hundred Years Later: What Woul Frederick W. Taylor Say?’ International Journal of Business and Social Science, vol. 2, no. 20, pp. 8-11.

Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Paine, J.B., Bachrach, D.G. (2000) ‘Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research’, Journal of Management, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 513-563.

Thomson, A. (1996) La Mettrie: Machine Man and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Vroom, V.H. (1964): Work and Motivation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Weber, M. (1976) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: George Allen & Unwin.

Wosnitza, M. et al. (2009) Contemporary motivation research: From global to local perspectives. Ashland: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.

Additional Files

Published

2012-06-30

How to Cite

Kolman, L., Chýlová, H. and Selby, R. (2012) ’AN ATTEMPT ON NEW SYSTEMATIZATION OF WORK MOTIVATION THEORIES’, Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 92-98 https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2012.050204.

Issue

Section

Short communication

Most read articles by the same author(s)