Factors of Quality Assessment in Higher Education and Its Impact on Business Students’ Development and Interest in University Education
Keywords:Quality, assurance, university, evaluation, interest, education
Human resource development at universities is one of the crucial aspects that forms an innovative and growing society. Therefore, it is crucial to continuously manage and develop factors of quality evaluation process in all universities to develop also human resources for labor market. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to identify factors of education quality which impact students´ interest in attending lessons and courses. Data were collected by students’ questionnaire at case business university. Two dimensional statistical methods were used to evaluate the results. Totally, 1,607 students were questioned. The outputs show link towards students’ interest in lessons and courses based on the quality of human resource development. There were four factors determining quality of human development found: practically oriented lessons; open and discussing teachers; subject extent and difficulty; and newcomers. The limitations of this study may be seen in the collection of data based on self-reports of students only and may therefore be subject to common-method bias. To minimize this limitation, the survey was assuring students that there was no right or wrong answer and their contribution towards higher quality was highly appreciated.
AACSB (2016) Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Business Accreditation, Aacsb.edu, [Online], Available: http://www.aacsb.edu/~/media/AACSB/Docs/Accreditation/Standards/2013-bus-standards-update.ashx [9 Jul 2020].
ACBSP (2020) ACBSP standards and criteria for demonstrating excellence in baccalaureate/graduate degree business programs, [Online], Available: https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.acbsp.org/resource/collection/EB5F486D-441E-4156-9991-00D6C3A44ED1/ACBSP_Unified_Standards_and_Criteria_for_Accreditation.pdf [9 Jul 2020].
Ahmad, F. and Aziz, J. (2009) ‘Students’ perception of the teachers’ teaching of literature communicating and understanding through the eyes of the audience’, European Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 17–26.
Alepis, E. and Virvou, M. (2014) Object-oriented user interfaces for personalized mobile learning, Berlin: Springer.
Aminbeidokhti, A., Jamshidi, L. and Mohammadi Hoseini, A. (2014) ‘The effect of the total quality management on organizational innovation in higher education mediated by organizational learning’, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 41, No. 7, pp. 1153–1166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.966667
Ashraf, M. A., Ibrahim, Y. and Joarder, M. (2009) ‘Quality education management at private universities in Bangladesh: An exploratory study’, Journal of Educators & Education/Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan, Vol. 24, pp. 17–32.
Bryk, A. and Schneider, B. (2002) Trust in schools, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Chui, T. B., bin Ahmad, M. S., binti Ahmad Bassim, F. and binti Ahmad Zaimi, N. (2016) ‘Evaluation of service quality of private higher education using service improvement matrix’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 224, pp. 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.417
Colombo, A. and Gómez Pradas, M. (2014) ‘SIMULACRE: A proposal for practical training in e learning environments’, RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v11i3.1781
Curtin University (2015) Unit Survey, [Online], Available: http://evaluate.curtin.edu.au/info/unit_survey.cfm [9 Jul 2020].
Darwin, S. (2016) ‘The emergence of contesting motives for student feedback-based evaluation in Australian higher education’, Higher Education Research & Development, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 419–432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1107879
Devadoss, S. and Foltz, J. (1996) ‘Evaluation of Factors Influencing Student Class Attendance and Performance’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 499–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1243268
Deveci, H. (2015) ‘Value Education Through Distance Learning: Opinions of Students who already Completed Value Education’, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 112–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.17718/tojde.89079
Dolton, P., Marcenaro, O. D. and Navarro, L. (2003) ‘The effective use of student time: a stochastic frontier production function case study’, Economics of Education Review, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 547–560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(03)00027-X
Dufour, C. (2015) ‘The Tools and Methods Used for the Continuous Evaluation of Education Programmes’, Documentation et Bibliotheques, Vol. 61, No. 2-3, pp. 90–103. https://doi.org/10.7202/1032814ar
ENQA (2005) Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area, drafted by ENQA in cooperation with EUA, EURASHE and ESIB and endorsed by the ministers of education of the Bologna signatory states at the Bergen meeting of May 2005, [Online], Available: http://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/ESG_3edition-2.pdf [9 Jul 2020].
Fajčíková A. and Urbancová H. (2019) ‘Can higher education institutions adapt to students´ preferences? A case study at the Czech state university’, International Journal for Quality Research, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 721–734. http://dx.doi.org/10.24874/IJQR13.03-14
Feldman, K. A. (1996) ‘Identifying exemplary teaching: Using data from course and teacher evaluations’, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Vol. 65, pp. 41–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219966509
Ferro, G. and D’Elia, V. (2020) ‘Higher Education Efficiency Frontier Analysis: A Review of Variables to Consider’, Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 140–153. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2020.130304
Flegl, M. and Andrade Rosas, L. A. (2019) ‘Do professor’s age and gender matter or do students give higher value to professors’ experience?’, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 511–532. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-12-2018-0127
Gámiz Sánchez, V., Montes Soldado, R. and Pérez López, M. C. (2014) ‘Self-assessment via a blended-learning strategy to improve performance in an accounting subject’, RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 43. http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v11i2.2055
Garwe, E. C. (2014) ‘Quality assurance in higher education in Zimbabwe’, Research in Higher Education Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 1–10.
Guilbault, M. (2018) ‘Students as customers in higher education: The (controversial) debate needs to end’, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 40, pp. 295–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.03.006
He, Y. and Hutson, B. (2016) ‘Appreciative Assessment in Academic Advising’, The Review of Higher Education, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 213–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2016.0003
Hebák, P., Malá, I. and Hustopecký, J. (2006) Vícerozměrné statistické metody. [Multidimensional Statistical Methods], Prague: Informatorium.
Heffernan, N. T., Ostrow, K. S., Kelly, K., Selent, D., Van Inwegen, E. G, Xiong, X. and Williams, J. J. (2016) ‘The Future of Adaptive Learning: Does the Crowd Hold the Key?’, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 615–644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0094-z
Hendl, J. (2006) Přehled statistických metod zpracování dat: analýza a metaanalýza dat [Overview of Statistical Methods and Data Analysis: Analysis and metaanalysis of data], Prague: Portál.
Hopland, A. O. and Nyhus, O. H. (2016) ‘Learning environment and student effort’, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 271–286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-05-2014-0070
Hossain, M. A., Hossain, M. M. and Chowdhury, T. H. (2018) ‘Understanding the success of private universities: An empirical investigation from graduates’ perspective’, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 145–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-02-2015-0031
IACBE (2019) Accreditation process manual, [Online], Available: https://iacbe.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Accred-Process-Manual-Approved-April-2019-1.pdf [25 Jan 2022].
Ji, H., Tian, H., Dong, T. (2015) ‘The Effect of the Formative Evaluation on the Medical Student's Career Emotion, Practicing Skills and Social Adaptation’, International Conference on Social Science, Management and Economics (SSME 2015), Lancaster, pp. 313–317.
Jones, L., Allen, B., Dunn, P. and Brooker, L. (2016) ‘Demystifying the rubric: a five-step pedagogy to improve student understanding and utilisation of marking criteria’, Higher Education Research & Development, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1177000
Khosravi, A. A., Poushaneh, K., Roozegar, A. and Sohrabifard, N. (2013) ‘Determination of Factors Affecting Student Satisfaction of Islamic Azad University’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 84, pp. 579–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.607
Khabibullina, D. A., Fakhrutdinova, R.A. and Diuanova, R.K. (2017) ‘The logic of realization of the student's personality formation model through the means of the subjects of the language cycle’, Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, Vol. 7, No. 9, pp. 535–539.
Kifle, T., and Alauddin, M. (2016) ‘What Determines Students’ Perceptions in Course Evaluation Rating in Higher Education? An Econometric Exploration’, Economic Analysis and Policy, Vol. 52, pp. 123–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2016.09.004
Klein, C., Lester, J., Rangwala, H. and Johri, A. (2019) ‘Learning Analytics Tools in Higher Education: Adoption at the Intersection of Institutional Commitment and Individual Action’, Review of Higher Education, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 565–593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0007
Kramarski, B. and Michalsky, T. (2009) ‘Investigating preservice teachers' professional growth in self-regulated learning environments’, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 101, No. 1, pp. 161–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013101
Leonnard (2021) ‘Antecedents of private university students’ satisfaction: The effects of traditional and electronic service quality’, Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 154–166. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2021.140303
Limanond, T., Jomnonkwao, S., Watthanaklang, D., Ratanavaraha, V. and Siridhara, S. (2011) ‘How vehicle ownership affect time utilization on study, leisure, social activities, and academic performance of university students? A case study of engineering freshmen in a rural university in Thailand’, Transport Policy, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 719 – 726. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.01.007
Lindstadt, M. A. (2005) ‘Employing mediation to approach truants’, Family Court Review, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 303–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00031.x
Mazais, J., Lapiņa, I. and Liepiņa, R. (2012) ‘Process Management for Quality Assurance: Case of Universities’, Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance, Pafos, pp. 8–9.
McCluskey, C. P., Bynum, T. S. and Patchin, J. W. (2004) ‘Reducing Chronic Absenteeism: an Assessment of an Early Truancy Initiative’, Crime & Delinquency, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 214–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011128703258942
Merchant, B., Ärlestig, H., Garza, E., Johansson, O., Murakami-Ramalho, E. and Törnsen, M. (2012) ‘Successful school leadership in Sweden and the US. Contexts of social responsibility and individualism’, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 428–441. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541211240228
Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. and Mulder, M. (2016) ‘Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay’, The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 31, pp. 20–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.002
Remedios, R., and Lieberman, D. A. (2008) ‘I liked your course because you taught me well: The influence of grades, workload, expectations and goals on students' evaluations of teaching’, British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 91–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01411920701492043
Ryan, A. M. (2001) ‘The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescent motivation and achievement’, Child Development, Vol. 72, No. 4, pp. 1135–1150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00338
Savva, L. I., Saigushev, N. Y., Vedeneeva, O.A., Pavlova, L. V. and Rabin, E. I. (2017) ‘Student's time-awareness formation: Self-organized personality as promoting factor for mental health’, European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Vol. 26, pp. 858–864. https://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.07.02.111
Sammons, P., Gu, Q., Day, C. and Ko, J. (2011) ‘Exploring the impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes. Results from a study of academically improved and effective schools in England’, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541111100134
Simic, M. L., Stimac, H. and Barilovic, Z. (2019) ‘Education sevice yuality – Private vs. public business education in Croatia’, Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, pp. 75–84.
Stanca, L. (2006) ‘The Effects of Attendance on Academic Performance: Panel Data Evidence for Introductory Microeconomics’, The Journal of Economic Education, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 251–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JECE.37.3.251-266
Šnýdrová, M., Depoo, L. and Šnýdrová, I. (2021) ‘How University Graduation Shapes Attitudes Toward Employment in Different Generations Operating at Job Market?’, Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 143–153. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2021.140302
Tang, W., Bai, J., Liu, J., Wang, H. and Chen, Q. (2012) ‘Students’ evaluation indicators of the curriculum’, International Journal of Medical Education, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 103–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4fcc.d2a6
Trajkovik, V., Malinovski, T., Vasileva-Stojanovska, T. and Vasileva, M. (2018) ‘Traditional games in elementary school: Relationships of student's personality traits, motivation and experience with learning outcomes’, Plos One, Vol. 13, No. 8, e0202172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202172
Tram, D. N. and Williamson, J. (2009) ‘Evaluation of teaching: hidden assumptions about conception of teaching’, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Teaching and Learning, Rotterdam.
Voronchenko, T., Vinogradova, N. and Zherebtsova, E. (2014) ‘Teacher's Professional Health as a Factor of the Development of a Student's Harmonic Personality’, 5th World Conference on Psychology, Counseling and Guidance, Dubrovnik, pp. 235–238. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.364
Wachtel, H. K. (1998) ‘Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 191–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260293980230207
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) ‘Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence’, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 2–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1251446
Zhdanko, T. A. (2018) ‘Competitiveness of student´s personality – Modern imperative’, European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Vol. 50, pp. 1254–1261. https://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.12.154
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Lucie Depoo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors declare with this manuscript intended for publication to ERIES Journal that:
- all co-authors agree with the publication of the manuscript even after amendments arising from peer review;
- all co-authors agree with the posting of the full text of this work on the web page of ERIES Journal and to the inclusion of references in databases accessible on the internet;
- no results of other researchers were used in the submitted manuscript without their consent, proper citation, or acknowledgement of their cooperation or material provided;
- the results (or any part of them) used in the manuscript have not been sent for publication to any other journal nor have they already been published (or if so, that the relevant works are cited in this manuscript);
- submission of the manuscript for publication was completed in accordance with the publishing regulations pertaining to place of work;
- experiments performed comply with current laws and written consent of the Scientific Ethics Committee / National Animal Care Authority (as is mentioned in the manuscript submitted);
- grant holders confirm that they have been informed of the submitted manuscript and they agree to its publication.
Authors retain copyright and grant ERIES Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the published work with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. Moreover, authors are able to post the published work in an institutional repository with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. In addition, authors are permitted and encouraged to post the published work online (e.g. institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.